Refutation of Richard Gill's Argument Against my Disproof of Bell's Theorem
arXiv:1203.2529
Abstract
I identify a number of errors in Richard Gill's purported refutation (arXiv:1203.1504) of my disproof of Bell's theorem. In particular, I point out that his central argument is based, not only on a rather trivial misreading of my counterexample to Bell's theorem, but also on a simple oversight of a freedom of choice in the orientation of a Clifford algebra. What is innovative and original in my counterexample is thus mistaken for an error, at the expense of the professed universality and generality of Bell's theorem.
16 pages; A third appendix is added, Appendix C, in response to a recent critique by Richard D. Gill of my latest paper on Dr. Bertlmann's socks: arXiv:1911.11578v6. arXiv admin note: text overlap with arXiv:1110.5876
References in corpus (7)
- What Really Sets the Upper Bound on Quantum Correlations?
- Can Bell's Prescription for Physical Reality Be Considered Complete?
- Failure of Bell's Theorem and the Local Causality of the Entangled Photons
- Disproof of Bell's Theorem: Reply to Critics
- Disproof of Bell's Theorem: Further Consolidations
- On the Origins of Quantum Correlations
- Refutation of Some Arguments Against my Disproof of Bell's Theorem
Cited by in corpus (5)
- Dr. Bertlmann's Socks in the Quaternionic World of Ambidextral Reality
- Reply to "Comment on 'Dr. Bertlmann's Socks in a Quaternionic World of Ambidextral Reality'"
- Reply to "Comment on 'Bell's Theorem Versus Local Realism in a Quaternionic Model of Physical Space'"
- Refutation of Some Arguments Against my Disproof of Bell's Theorem
- Whither All the Scope and Generality of Bell's Theorem?