Refutation of Some Arguments Against my Disproof of Bell's Theorem

Abstract

In a couple of recent preprints Moldoveanu has suggested that there are errors in my disproof of Bell's theorem. Here I show that this claim is false. In particular, I show that my local-realistic framework is incorrectly and misleadingly presented in both of his preprints. In addition there are a number of serious mathematical and conceptual errors in his discussion of my framework. For example, contrary to his claim, my framework is manifestly non-contextual. In particular, quantum correlations are understood within it as purely topological effects, not contextual effects.

16 pages; Published as a Chapter in Disproof of Bell's Theorem: Illuminating the Illusion of Entanglement (BrownWalker Press, Florida, 2014); A new section, section XIV, entitled "Notes added to proof --- responses to past criticisms", is added, following a suggestion by a reviewer and a journal editor

References in corpus (9)

• Macroscopic Observability of Spinorial Sign Changes under 2pi Rotations
• What Really Sets the Upper Bound on Quantum Correlations?
• Can Bell's Prescription for Physical Reality Be Considered Complete?
• Failure of Bell's Theorem and the Local Causality of the Entangled Photons
• Disproof of Bell's Theorem: Reply to Critics
• Refutation of Richard Gill's Argument Against my Disproof of Bell's Theorem
• Disproof of Bell's Theorem: Further Consolidations
• On the Origins of Quantum Correlations
• Disproof of Joy Christian's "Disproof of Bell's theorem"

Cited by in corpus (2)

• Refutation of Richard Gill's Argument Against my Disproof of Bell's Theorem
• Whither All the Scope and Generality of Bell's Theorem?