Bayesian versus frequentist upper limits
arXiv:1103.2987
Abstract
While gravitational waves have not yet been measured directly, data analysis from detection experiments commonly includes an upper limit statement. Such upper limits may be derived via a frequentist or Bayesian approach; the theoretical implications are very different, and on the technical side, one notable difference is that one case requires maximization of the likelihood function over parameter space, while the other requires integration. Using a simple example (detection of a sinusoidal signal in white Gaussian noise), we investigate the differences in performance and interpretation, and the effect of the "trials factor", or "look-elsewhere effect".
http://cdsweb.cern.ch/record/1306523/files/CERN-2011-006.pdf, http://indico.cern.ch/materialDisplay.py?contribId=52&materialId=paper&confId=107747
Cited by in corpus (6)
- Gravitational waves from known pulsars: results from the initial detector era
- Upper Limits on Gravitational Waves from Scorpius X-1 from a Model-Based Cross-Correlation Search in Advanced LIGO Data
- Fast and Accurate Sensitivity Estimation for Continuous-Gravitational-Wave Searches
- Estimating the sensitivity of wide-parameter-space searches for gravitational-wave pulsars
- A Student-t based filter for robust signal detection
- Searching for high-energy gamma-ray counterparts to Gravitational Wave sources with Fermi-LAT: a needle in a haystack