Popular and/or Prestigious? Measures of Scholarly Esteem

Abstract

Citation analysis does not generally take the quality of citations into account: all citations are weighted equally irrespective of source. However, a scholar may be highly cited but not highly regarded: popularity and prestige are not identical measures of esteem. In this study we define popularity as the number of times an author is cited and prestige as the number of times an author is cited by highly cited papers. Information Retrieval (IR) is the test field. We compare the 40 leading researchers in terms of their popularity and prestige over time. Some authors are ranked high on prestige but not on popularity, while others are ranked high on popularity but not on prestige. We also relate measures of popularity and prestige to date of Ph.D. award, number of key publications, organizational affiliation, receipt of prizes/honors, and gender.

26 pages, 5 figures

References in corpus (5)

• An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output
• The structure of scientific collaboration networks
• How Popular is Your Paper? An Empirical Study of the Citation Distribution
• A principal component analysis of 39 scientific impact measures
• Promise and Pitfalls of Extending Google's PageRank Algorithm to Citation Networks