Luminosity function of galaxies in groups in the SDSS DR7: the dependence on mass, environment and galaxy type
arXiv:1012.3445 · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.18878.x
Abstract
We perform an analysis of the luminosities of galaxies in groups in the SDSS DR7. We analyse the luminosity function (LF) as a function of group mass for different photometric bands, galaxy populations, galaxy positions within the groups, and the group surrounding large scale density. We find that M* brightens and alpha becomes steeper as a function of mass in all SDSS photometric bands, in agreement with previous results. From the analysis of different galaxy populations, we observe that different methods to split galaxy populations, based on the concentration index or the colour-magnitude diagram, produce quite different behaviours in the luminosity trends, mainly for alpha. These discrepancies and the trends with mass mentioned above are explained when analysing the LF of galaxies classified simultaneously according to their concentrations and colours. We find that only the red spheroids have a LF that strongly depends on group mass. Late type galaxies, whether blue or red, have luminosity functions that do not depend on group mass. The intrinsic change in the LF of spheroids and the varying number contributions of the different types explain all the observed trends with group mass. On the other hand, dividing the galaxy members in the inner and outer regions of the groups do not introduce a significant difference in the Schechter parameter trends, except for the characteristic absolute magnitude in the high group virial mass range (M>1x10^13 M_sun/h) which is an indication of luminosity segregation in massive groups. Finally, we also analyse the possible influence of the large scale surrounding environment on the LF. We find that galaxies inhabiting groups at low density regions experience more pronounced variations on the Schechter parameters as a function of groups mass, while galaxies in groups at high density regions show an almost constant behaviour.
14 pages, 9 figures, 1 table, final version published in MNRAS
References in corpus (7)
- K-corrections and filter transformations in the ultraviolet, optical, and near infrared
- A Cosmological Framework for the Co-Evolution of Quasars, Supermassive Black Holes, and Elliptical Galaxies: I. Galaxy Mergers & Quasar Activity
- Galaxy morphology, luminosity and, environment in the SDSS DR7
- Anatomy of luminosity functions: the 2dFGRS example
- On the luminosity function of galaxies in groups in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey
- Satellite Luminosities in Galaxy Groups
- COMBO-17 measurements of the effect of environment on the type-dependent galaxy luminosity function
Cited by in corpus (39)
- Galaxy Cluster Baryon Fractions Revisited
- On the origin of the faint-end of the red sequence in high density environments
- The importance of major mergers in the build up of stellar mass in brightest cluster galaxies at z=1
- Galaxies infalling into groups: filaments vs. isotropic infall
- Environments of galaxies in groups within the supercluster-void network
- The importance of the local density in shaping the galaxy stellar mass functions
- The cosmic web of the Local Universe: cosmic variance, matter content and its relation to galaxy morphology
- Green Valley galaxies as a transition population in different environments
- A comparison of cosmological filaments catalogues
- Comparing galaxy populations in compact and loose groups of galaxies
- Fossil group origins V. The dependence of the luminosity function on the magnitude gap
- Galaxy And Mass Assembly (GAMA): Bivariate functions of H star forming galaxies
- The dynamical state of galaxy groups and their luminosity content
- Galaxy and Mass Assembly: luminosity and stellar mass functions in GAMA groups
- Fossil groups in the Millennium simulation. From the brightest to the faintest galaxies during the past 8 Gyr
- Deep spectroscopy of nearby galaxy clusters: II. The Hercules cluster
- Assessing the reliability of Friends-of-Friends groups on the future Javalambre Physics of the Accelerating Universe Astrophysical Survey
- Morphology with Light Profile Fitting of Confirmed Cluster Galaxies at z=0.84
- Compact Groups of Galaxies in Sloan Digital Sky Survey and LAMOST Spectral Survey. II. Dynamical Properties of Isolated and Embedded Groups
- The Galaxy Population In Voids: Are All Voids The Same?
- Effects of environment on sSFR profiles of late-type galaxies in the CALIFA survey
- Radial Distribution Of ISM Gas-phase Metallicity In CLASH Clusters at z~0.35: A New Outlook On Environmental Impact On Galaxy Evolution
- Galaxy populations in groups and clusters: evidence for a characteristic stellar mass scale at
- Hickson-like compact groups inhabiting different environments
- Comparing galaxy populations in compact and loose groups of galaxies III. Effects of environment on star formation
- The influence of Hickson-like compact group environment on galaxy luminosities
- Comparing galaxy populations in compact and loose groups of galaxies II: brightest group galaxies
- Reconstructing Orbits of Galaxies in Extreme Regions (ROGER) III: galaxy evolution patterns in projected phase space around massive X-ray clusters
- Evolutionary properties of the low-luminosity galaxy population in the NGC5044 Group
- Weak lensing analysis of galaxy pairs using CS82 data
- Fossil group origins: VIII RXJ075243.6+455653 a transitionary fossil group
- The miniJPAS survey. Evolution of the luminosity and stellar mass functions of galaxies up to
- The luminosity of cluster galaxies in the Cluster-EAGLE simulations
- Structure and large scale environment of galaxy pairs in the S-PLUS DR4
- Cosmic filament spin -- I: a comparative study in observation
- Intrinsic correlations of galaxy sizes in a hydrodynamical cosmological simulation
- Scaling laws in the stellar mass distribution and the transition to homogeneity
- Compact groups of galaxies in GAMA -- Probing the densest minor systems at intermediate redshifts
- A Conditional Abundance Matching Method of Extending Simulated Halo Merger Trees to Resolve Low-Mass Progenitors and Sub-halos