The latitude dependence of the rotation measures of NVSS sources
arXiv:1011.0737 · doi:10.1111/j.1745-3933.2010.00975.x
Abstract
In this Letter I use the variation of the spread in rotation measure (RM) with Galactic latitude to separate the Galactic from the extragalactic contributions to RM. This is possible since the latter does not depend on Galactic latitude. As input data I use RMs from the catalogue by Taylor, Stil, and Sunstrum, supplemented with published values for the spread in RM (`sigmaRM') in specific regions on the sky. I test 4 models of the free electron column density (which I will abbreviate to `DMinf') of the Milky Way, and the best model builds up DMinf on a characteristic scale of a few kpc from the Sun. sigmaRM correlates well with DMinf. The measured sigmaRM can be modelled as a Galactic contribution, consisting of a term sigmaRM,MW that is amplified at smaller Galactic latitudes as 1/sin|b|, in a similar way to DMinf, and an extragalactic contribution, sigmaRM,EG, that is independent of latitude. This model is sensitive to the relative magnitudes of sigmaRM,MW and sigmaRM,EG, and the best fit is produced by sigmaRM,MW approx. 8 rad/m^2 and sigmaRM,EG approx. 6 rad/m^2. The 4 published values for sigmaRM as a function of latitude suggest an even larger sigmaRM,MW contribution and a smaller sigmaRM,EG. This result from the NVSS RMs and published sigmaRM shows that the Galactic contribution dominates structure in RM on scales between about 1degr -- 10degr on the sky. I work out which factors contribute to the variation of sigmaRM with Galactic latitude, and show that the sigmaRM,EG I derived is an upper limit. Furthermore, to explain the modelled sigmaRM,MW requires that structure in <B||> has a 1-sigma spread <~ 0.4 microG.
6 pages, 3 figures, 1 table. Published in MNRAS Letters; the definitive version is available at wileyonlinelibrary.com, http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1745-3933.2010.00957.x/pdf
References in corpus (9)
- Five-Year Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) Observations: Cosmological Interpretation
- Cosmology and the Fate of Dilatation Symmetry
- High resolution CMB power spectrum from the complete ACBAR data set
- Coupled and Extended Quintessence: theoretical differences and structure formation
- Constraining Interactions in Cosmology's Dark Sector
- Evolution of Massive Haloes in non-Gaussian Scenarios
- Clarifying spherical collapse in coupled dark energy cosmologies
- Mass functions in coupled Dark Energy models
- Do WMAP data favor neutrino mass and a coupling between Cold Dark Matter and Dark Energy?
Cited by in corpus (15)
- Update on Coupled Dark Energy and the tension
- Soundness of Dark Energy properties
- Remedy of some cosmological tensions via effective phantom-like behavior of interacting vacuum energy
- Precision cosmology with a wide area XMM cluster survey
- Implications of multiple high-redshift galaxy clusters
- Cosmological direct detection of dark energy: non-linear structure formation signatures of dark energy scattering with visible matter
- Distinguishing interacting dark energy from wCDM with CMB, lensing, and baryon acoustic oscillation data
- Chandra deep observation of XDCP J0044.0-2033, a massive galaxy cluster at z>1.5
- Simulating Momentum Exchange in the Dark Sector
- Non-minimally coupled dark matter: effective pressure and structure formation
- Interacting Dark Energy: New parametrization and observational constraints
- Numerical Simulations of the Dark Universe: State of the Art and the Next Decade
- Dark Energy Simulations
- New tests of dark sector interactions from the full-shape galaxy power spectrum
- The galaxy cluster concentration-mass relation in dark energy cosmologies