Analyzing Problem Solving Using Math in Physics: Epistemological Framing via Warrants
arXiv:0908.0028 · doi:10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.5.020108
Abstract
Developing expertise in physics entails learning to use mathematics effectively and efficiently as applied to the context of physical situations. Doing so involves coordinating a variety of concepts and skills including mathematical processing, computation, blending ancillary information with the math, and reading out physical implications from the math and vice versa. From videotaped observations of intermediate level students solving problems in groups, we note that students often "get stuck" using a limited group of skills or reasoning and fail to notice that a different set of tools (which they possess and know how to use effectively) could quickly and easily solve their problem. We refer to a student's perception/judgment of the kind of knowledge that is appropriate to bring to bear in a particular situation as epistemological framing. Although epistemological framing is often unstated (and even unconscious), in group problem solving situations students sometimes get into disagreements about how to progress. During these disagreements, they bring forth explicit reasons or warrants in support of their point of view. For the context of mathematics use in physics problem solving, we present a system for classifying physics students' warrants. This warrant analysis offers tangible evidence of their epistemological framing.
23 pages
References in corpus (2)
Cited by in corpus (16)
- Language of physics, language of math: Disciplinary culture and dynamic epistemology
- Beyond deficit-based models of learners' cognition: Interpreting engineering students' difficulties with sense-making in terms of fine-grained epistemological and conceptual dynamics
- Epistemic Complexity and the Journeyman-Expert Transition
- Oersted Lecture 2013: How should we think about how our students think?
- Students' epistemological framing in quantum mechanics problem solving
- Mathematical Sensemaking as Seeking Coherence between Calculations and Concepts: Instruction and Assessments for Introductory Physics
- Student Understanding of Taylor Series Expansions in Statistical Mechanics
- Student Epistemological Framing on Paper-Based Assessments
- Dynamics of students' epistemological framing in group problem solving
- Toolboxes and handing students a hammer: The effects of cueing and instruction on getting students to think critically
- A Framework for Understanding the Impact of Integrating Conceptual and Quantitative Reasoning in a Quantum Optics Tutorial on Students' Conceptual Understanding
- Case study examining graduate student sensemaking using the epistemic game framework for Laplace's equation in upper-level electrostatics
- Perspectives of Women and Men Students and Faculty on Conceptual and Quantitative Problem-Solving in Physics from Introductory to Graduate Levels
- Instructor Framing and Incentives Shape Physics Students' Engagement and Learning Gains from an Inquiry-Based Electrostatics Tutorial on the Method of Images
- What does it mean to think like a physicist? Insights from physics graduate students
- Using tablets and smartphones as experimental tools in the physics classroom: effects on learning and motivation