Non-local Realistic Theories and the Scope of the Bell Theorem

Abstract

According to a widespread view, the Bell theorem establishes the untenability of so-called 'local realism'. On the basis of this view, recent proposals by Leggett, Zeilinger and others have been developed according to which it can be proved that even some non-local realistic theories have to be ruled out. As a consequence, within this view the Bell theorem allows one to establish that no reasonable form of realism, be it local or non-local, can be made compatible with the (experimentally tested) predictions of quantum mechanics. In the present paper it is argued that the Bell theorem has demonstrably nothing to do with the 'realism' as defined by these authors and that, as a consequence, their conclusions about the foundational significance of the Bell theorem are unjustified.

Forthcoming in Foundations of Physics

References in corpus (6)

• Quantum Information and Relativity Theory
• An experimental test of non-local realism
• Relational EPR
• Quantum Equilibrium and the Role of Operators as Observables in Quantum Theory
• Against `Realism'
• The Message of the Quantum?

Cited by in corpus (7)

• Non-realism : deep thought or a soft option ?
• Quantum Locality
• Against the No-Go Philosophy of Quantum Mechanics
• Quantum mechanical effect of path-polarization contextuality for a single photon
• Hardy's argument and successive spin-s measurements
• Stop making sense of Bell's theorem and nonlocality? A reply to Stephen Boughn
• Experimental proposal for testing the Emergence of Environment Induced (EIN) Classical Selection rules with Biological Systems