Stop making sense of Bell's theorem and nonlocality? A reply to Stephen Boughn

Abstract

In a recent paper [arXiv:1703.11003] on this journal Stephen Boughn argued that quantum mechanics does not require nonlocality of any kind and that the common interpretation of Bell theorem as a nonlocality result is based on a misunderstanding. In this note I argue that the Boughn arguments, that summarize views widespread in certain areas of the foundations of quantum mechanics, are based on an incorrect reading of the presuppositions of the EPR argument and the Bell theorem and, as a consequence, are totally unfounded.

References in corpus (3)

• Against `Realism'
• Making Sense of Bell's Theorem and Quantum Nonlocality
• Non-local Realistic Theories and the Scope of the Bell Theorem

Cited by in corpus (1)

• Answering Mermin's Challenge with Conservation per No Preferred Reference Frame