Rejoinder: One-step sparse estimates in nonconcave penalized likelihood models
arXiv:0808.1030 · doi:10.1214/07-AOS0316REJ
Abstract
We would like to take this opportunity to thank the discussants for their thoughtful comments and encouragements on our work [arXiv:0808.1012]. The discussants raised a number of issues from theoretical as well as computational perspectives. Our rejoinder will try to provide some insights into these issues and address specific questions asked by the discussants.
Published in at http://dx.doi.org/10.1214/07-AOS0316REJ the Annals of Statistics (http://www.imstat.org/aos/) by the Institute of Mathematical Statistics (http://www.imstat.org)
References in corpus (16)
- Rejoinder to "Least angle regression" by Efron et al
- Discussion of "Least angle regression" by Efron et al
- Discussion of "Least angle regression" by Efron et al
- Discussion of "Least angle regression" by Efron et al
- Discussion of "Least angle regression" by Efron et al
- Least Angle Regression
- Discussion of "Least angle regression" by Efron et al
- Discussion of "Least angle regression" by Efron et al
- Discussion of "Least angle regression" by Efron et al
- Discussion of "Least angle regression" by Efron et al
- High-dimensional graphs and variable selection with the Lasso
- Nonconcave penalized likelihood with a diverging number of parameters
- Optimal predictive model selection
- Variable selection in semiparametric regression modeling
- Statistical Challenges with High Dimensionality: Feature Selection in Knowledge Discovery
- Boosting with early stopping: Convergence and consistency