Objective priors for the bivariate normal model
arXiv:0804.0987 · doi:10.1214/07-AOS501
Abstract
Study of the bivariate normal distribution raises the full range of issues involving objective Bayesian inference, including the different types of objective priors (e.g., Jeffreys, invariant, reference, matching), the different modes of inference (e.g., Bayesian, frequentist, fiducial) and the criteria involved in deciding on optimal objective priors (e.g., ease of computation, frequentist performance, marginalization paradoxes). Summary recommendations as to optimal objective priors are made for a variety of inferences involving the bivariate normal distribution. In the course of the investigation, a variety of surprising results were found, including the availability of objective priors that yield exact frequentist inferences for many functions of the bivariate normal parameters, including the correlation coefficient.
Published in at http://dx.doi.org/10.1214/07-AOS501 the Annals of Statistics (http://www.imstat.org/aos/) by the Institute of Mathematical Statistics (http://www.imstat.org)
References in corpus (1)
Cited by in corpus (14)
- Overall Objective Priors
- A pragmatic Bayesian perspective on correlation analysis: The exoplanetary gravity - stellar activity case
- Optional Stopping with Bayes Factors: a categorization and extension of folklore results, with an application to invariant situations
- Second order ancillary: A differential view from continuity
- Fiducial and Posterior Sampling
- Inferring Latent Structure From Mixed Real and Categorical Relational Data
- Higher order asymptotics of Generalized Fiducial Distribution
- Probability matching priors for some parameters of the bivariate normal distribution
- Bayesian Estimation of Kendall's tau Using a Latent Normal Approach
- Discussion of "On the Birnbaum Argument for the Strong Likelihood Principle"
- Structure and Dynamics of the Young Massive Star Cluster Westerlund 1
- Rejoinder to Article by Berger, Bernardo, and Sun
- Objective Bayes Covariate-Adjusted Sparse Graphical Model Selection
- Comment on Article by Berger, Bernardo, and Sun