Limitations of Bayesian Evidence Applied to Cosmology

Abstract

There has been increasing interest by cosmologists in applying Bayesian techniques, such as Bayesian Evidence, for model selection. A typical example is in assessing whether observational data favour a cosmological constant over evolving dark energy. In this paper, the example of dark energy is used to illustrate limitations in the application of Bayesian Evidence associated with subjective judgements concerning the choice of model and priors. An analysis of recent cosmological data shows a statistically insignificant preference for a cosmological constant over simple dynamical models of dark energy. It is argued that for nested problems, as considered here, Bayesian parameter estimation can be more informative than computing Bayesian Evidence for poorly motivated physical models.

8 pages 4 figures MNRAS accepted. Substantially revised and extended

References in corpus (29)

• Dynamics of dark energy
• Detection of the Baryon Acoustic Peak in the Large-Scale Correlation Function of SDSS Luminous Red Galaxies
• Type Ia Supernova Discoveries at z>1 From the Hubble Space Telescope: Evidence for Past Deceleration and Constraints on Dark Energy Evolution
• The Cosmological Parameters 2006
• Big-Bang nucleosynthesis (Particle Data Group mini-review)
• The Supernova Legacy Survey: Measurement of Omega_M, Omega_Lambda and w from the First Year Data Set
• New Hubble Space Telescope Discoveries of Type Ia Supernovae at z > 1: Narrowing Constraints on the Early Behavior of Dark Energy
• Cosmological Tracking Solutions
• Information criteria for astrophysical model selection
• Observational Constraints on the Nature of the Dark Energy: First Cosmological Results from the ESSENCE Supernova Survey
• Scrutinizing Exotic Cosmological Models Using ESSENCE Supernova Data Combined with Other Cosmological Probes
• How many cosmological parameters?
• Applications of Bayesian model selection to cosmological parameters
• Robust Dark Energy Constraints from Supernovae, Galaxy Clustering, and Three-Year Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe Observations
• The essence of quintessence and the cost of compression
• Top ten accelerating cosmological models
• The Statistical Significance of the Low CMB Mulitipoles
• Present and future evidence for evolving dark energy
• Tension and Systematics in the Gold06 SnIa Dataset
• Observational Bounds on Cosmic Doomsday
• Direct reconstruction of the quintessence potential
• Bayesian Calibrated Significance Levels Applied to the Spectral Tilt and Hemispherical Asymmetry
• Quintessence reconstructed: new constraints and tracker viability
• H_0 and Odds on Cosmology
• Curved Space or Curved Vacuum?
• The LambdaCDM model on the lead -- a Bayesian cosmological models comparison
• Bayesian Evidence for a Cosmological Constant using new High-Redshift Supernovae Data
• The coincidence problem in linear dark energy models
• Discretuum versus Continuum Dark Energy

Cited by in corpus (7)

• The evidence for a spatially flat Universe
• Changing the prior: absolute neutrino mass constraints in nonlocal gravity
• An evaluation of cosmological models from expansion and growth of structure measurements
• Features in the primordial power spectrum? A frequentist analysis
• A Bayesian interpretation of inconsistency measures in cosmology
• On Probability and Cosmology: Inference Beyond Data?
• Bayesian analysis of running holographic Ricci dark energy