Limitations of Bayesian Evidence Applied to Cosmology

Abstract

There has been increasing interest by cosmologists in applying Bayesian techniques, such as Bayesian Evidence, for model selection. A typical example is in assessing whether observational data favour a cosmological constant over evolving dark energy. In this paper, the example of dark energy is used to illustrate limitations in the application of Bayesian Evidence associated with subjective judgements concerning the choice of model and priors. An analysis of recent cosmological data shows a statistically insignificant preference for a cosmological constant over simple dynamical models of dark energy. It is argued that for nested problems, as considered here, Bayesian parameter estimation can be more informative than computing Bayesian Evidence for poorly motivated physical models.

8 pages 4 figures MNRAS accepted. Substantially revised and extended

References in corpus (7)

• New Hubble Space Telescope Discoveries of Type Ia Supernovae at z > 1: Narrowing Constraints on the Early Behavior of Dark Energy
• Observational Constraints on the Nature of the Dark Energy: First Cosmological Results from the ESSENCE Supernova Survey
• Present and future evidence for evolving dark energy
• Bayesian Calibrated Significance Levels Applied to the Spectral Tilt and Hemispherical Asymmetry
• Quintessence reconstructed: new constraints and tracker viability
• The LambdaCDM model on the lead -- a Bayesian cosmological models comparison
• Bayesian Evidence for a Cosmological Constant using new High-Redshift Supernovae Data