Two simple sufficient conditions for FDR control
arXiv:0802.1406 · doi:10.1214/08-EJS180
Abstract
We show that the control of the false discovery rate (FDR) for a multiple testing procedure is implied by two coupled simple sufficient conditions. The first one, which we call ``self-consistency condition'', concerns the algorithm itself, and the second, called ``dependency control condition'' is related to the dependency assumptions on the -value family. Many standard multiple testing procedures are self-consistent (e.g. step-up, step-down or step-up-down procedures), and we prove that the dependency control condition can be fulfilled when choosing correspondingly appropriate rejection functions, in three classical types of dependency: independence, positive dependency (PRDS) and unspecified dependency. As a consequence, we recover earlier results through simple and unifying proofs while extending their scope to several regards: weighted FDR, -value reweighting, new family of step-up procedures under unspecified -value dependency and adaptive step-up procedures. We give additional examples of other possible applications. This framework also allows for defining and studying FDR control for multiple testing procedures over a continuous, uncountable space of hypotheses.
Published in at http://dx.doi.org/10.1214/08-EJS180 the Electronic Journal of Statistics (http://www.i-journals.org/ejs/) by the Institute of Mathematical Statistics (http://www.imstat.org)
References in corpus (6)
- Generalizations of the Familywise Error Rate
- An adaptive step-down procedure with proven FDR control under independence
- On the false discovery rate and an asymptotically optimal rejection curve
- Two simple sufficient conditions for FDR control
- On stepdown control of the false discovery proportion
- Asymptotic properties of false discovery rate controlling procedures under independence
Cited by in corpus (15)
- Genome-Wide Significance Levels and Weighted Hypothesis Testing
- Two simple sufficient conditions for FDR control
- Covariate powered cross-weighted multiple testing
- Optimal weighting for false discovery rate control
- Permutation-based simultaneous confidence bounds for the false discovery proportion
- Multiple testing with discrete data: proportion of true null hypotheses and two adaptive FDR procedures
- Exact calculations for false discovery proportion with application to least favorable configurations
- New procedures controlling the false discovery proportion via Romano-Wolf's heuristic
- A shortcut for Hommel's procedure in linearithmic time
- Hypothesis testing with e-values
- Testing over a continuum of null hypotheses with False Discovery Rate control
- Post-selection inference for e-value based confidence intervals
- Controlling Costs: Feature Selection on a Budget
- Classes of Multiple Decision Functions Strongly Controlling FWER and FDR
- Variable Selection with the Knockoffs: Composite Null Hypotheses