The conjunction fallacy and interference effects

Abstract

In the present article we consider the conjunction fallacy, a well known cognitive heuristic experimentally tested in cognitive science, which occurs for intuitive judgments in situations of bounded rationality. We show that the quantum formalism can be used to describe in a very simple way this fallacy in terms of interference effect. We evidence that the quantum formalism leads quite naturally to violations of Bayes' rule when considering the estimated probability of the conjunction of two events. By defining the concept of maximal conjunction error, we find a good agreement with experimental results. Thus we suggest that in cognitive science the formalism of quantum mechanics can be used to describe a \textit{quantum regime}, the bounded-rationality regime, where the cognitive heuristics are valid.

17 pages, 1 figure

References in corpus (3)

• Quantum Games and Quantum Strategies
• Quantum mechanics, Bayes' theorem and the conjunction fallacy
• Quantum mechanics and rational ignorance

Cited by in corpus (6)

• Risk, ambiguity and quantum decision theory
• The inverse fallacy and quantum formalism
• Grover's algorithm and human memory
• Belief revision in quantum decision theory: gambler's and hot hand fallacies
• Descriptive and Foundational Aspects of Quantum Cognition
• TI-games I: An Exploration of Type Indeterminacy In Strategic Decision-Making