The Evolution of the Field and Cluster Morphology-Density Relation for Mass-Selected Samples of Galaxies
arXiv:0707.2787 · doi:10.1086/521783
Abstract
The Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS) and photometric/spectroscopic surveys in the GOODS-South field (the Chandra Deep Field-South, CDFS) are used to construct volume-limited, stellar mass-selected samples of galaxies at redshifts 0<z<1. The CDFS sample at 0.6<z<1.0 contains 207 galaxies complete down to M=4x10^10 Msol (for a ``diet'' Salpeter IMF), corresponding to a luminosity limit for red galaxies of M_B=-20.1. The SDSS sample at 0.020<z<0.045 contains 2003 galaxies down to the same mass limit, which corresponds to M_B=-19.3 for red galaxies. Morphologies are determined with an automated method, using the Sersic parameter n and a measure of the residual from the model fits, called ``bumpiness'', to distinguish different morphologies. These classifications are verified with visual classifications. In agreement with previous studies, 65-70% of the galaxies are located on the red sequence, both at z~0.03 and at z~0.8. Similarly, 65-70% of the galaxies have n>2.5. The fraction of E+S0 galaxies is 43+/-3%$ at z~0.03 and 48+/-7% at z~0.8, i.e., it has not changed significantly since z~0.8. When combined with recent results for cluster galaxies in the same redshift range, we find that the morphology-density relation for galaxies more massive than 0.5M* has remained constant since at least z~0.8. This implies that galaxies evolve in mass, morphology and density such that the morphology-density relation does not change. In particular, the decline of star formation activity and the accompanying increase in the stellar mass density of red galaxies since z~1 must happen without large changes in the early-type galaxy fraction in a given environment.
16 pages, 13 figures, 2 tables. Updated to match journal version. Will appear in ApJ (vol. 670, p. 206)
References in corpus (11)
- Star Formation in AEGIS Field Galaxies since z=1.1 : The Dominance of Gradually Declining Star Formation, and the Main Sequence of Star-Forming Galaxies
- What do we learn from IRAC observations of galaxies at 2 < z < 3.5?
- How special are Brightest Group and Cluster Galaxies?
- The build-up of the colour-magnitude relation in galaxy clusters since z~0.8
- The Star Formation Epoch of the Most Massive Early-Type Galaxies
- The effects of environment on morphological evolution between 0<z<1.2 in the COSMOS Survey
- Clusters at Half Hubble Time: Galaxy Structure and Colors in RXJ0152.7-1357 and MS1054-03
- The Gemini Deep Deep Survey: VIII. When Did Early-type Galaxies Form?
- Mass-Selection and the Evolution of the Morphology-Density Relation from z=0.8 to z=0
- The Possible z=0.83 Precursors of z=0 M* Early-type Cluster Galaxies
- Low Star Formation Rates for z=1 Early-Type Galaxies in the Very Deep GOODS-MIPS Imaging: Implications for their Optical/Near-Infrared Spectral Energy Distributions
Cited by in corpus (13)
- Galaxy Zoo: the dependence of morphology and colour on environment
- The Galaxy Content of SDSS Clusters and Groups
- Evolution of the Color-Magnitude Relation in Galaxy Clusters at z ~1 from the ACS Intermediate Redshift Cluster Survey
- The Detection of a Red Sequence of Massive Field Galaxies at z~2.3 and its Evolution to z~0
- Strange filamentary structures ("fireballs") around a merger galaxy in the Coma cluster of galaxies
- The stellar population histories of early-type galaxies. III. The Coma Cluster
- The Dependence of Galaxy Morphology and Structure on Environment and Stellar Mass
- Mass-Selection and the Evolution of the Morphology-Density Relation from z=0.8 to z=0
- Clustering properties of a type-selected volume-limited sample of galaxies in the CFHTLS
- Spatially Resolved Galaxy Star Formation and its Environmental Dependence I
- Spatially Resolved Stellar Kinematics of Field Early-Type Galaxies at z=1: Evolution of the Rotation Rate
- Evidence for Morphology and Luminosity Transformation of Galaxies at High Redshifts
- Spatially Resolved Galaxy Star Formation and its Environmental Dependence II. Effect of the Morphology-Density Relation