45 citations
Counting papers with at most 25 authors, so collaboration author lists do not stand in for the people here.
5 papers
Efficiency in managing peer-review of scientific manuscripts -- editors' perspective
Olgica Nedic, Ivana Drvenica, Marcel Ausloos +1
The purpose of this paper is to introduce a model for measuring the efficiency in managing peer-review of scientific manuscripts by editors. The approach employed is based on the a…
Day of the week effect in paper submission/acceptance/rejection to/in/by peer review journals. II. An ARCH econometric-like modeling
Marcel Ausloos, Olgica Nedic, Aleksandar Dekanski +3
This paper aims at providing a statistical model for the preferred behavior of authors submitting a paper to a scientific journal. The electronic submission of (about 600) papers t…
Day of the week effect in paper submission/acceptance/rejection to/in/by peer review journals
Marcel Ausloos, Olgica Nedic, Aleksandar Dekanski
This paper aims at providing an introduction to the behavior of authors submitting a paper to a scientific journal. Dates of electronic submission of papers to the Journal of the S…
Quantifying the quality of peer reviewers through Zipf's law
Marcel Ausloos, Olgica Nedic, Agata Fronczak +1
This paper introduces a statistical and other analysis of peer reviewers in order to approach their "quality" through some quantification measure, thereby leading to some quality m…
Review times in peer review: quantitative analysis of editorial workflows
Maciej J. Mrowinski, Agata Fronczak, Piotr Fronczak +2
We examine selected aspects of peer review and suggest possible improvements. To this end, we analyse a dataset containing information about 300 papers submitted to the Biochemistr…