56 citations · 177 across the 8 of their papers we have counts for
8 papers
Seasonal Entropy, Diversity and Inequality Measures of Submitted and Accepted Papers Distributions In Peer-Reviewed Journals
Marcel Ausloos, Olgica Nedic, Aleksandar Dekanski
This paper presents a novel method for finding features in the analysis of variable distributions stemming from time series. We apply the methodology to the case of submitted and a…
Correlations between submission and acceptance of papers in peer review journals
Marcel Ausloos, Olgica Nedic, Aleksandar Dekanski
This paper provides a comparative study about seasonal influence on editorial decisions for papers submitted to two peer review journals. We distinguish a specialized one, the Jour…
Efficiency in managing peer-review of scientific manuscripts -- editors' perspective
Olgica Nedic, Ivana Drvenica, Marcel Ausloos +1
The purpose of this paper is to introduce a model for measuring the efficiency in managing peer-review of scientific manuscripts by editors. The approach employed is based on the a…
Artificial intelligence in peer review: How can evolutionary computation support journal editors?
Maciej J. Mrowinski, Piotr Fronczak, Agata Fronczak +2
With the volume of manuscripts submitted for publication growing every year, the deficiencies of peer review (e.g. long review times) are becoming more apparent. Editorial strategi…
Day of the week effect in paper submission/acceptance/rejection to/in/by peer review journals. II. An ARCH econometric-like modeling
Marcel Ausloos, Olgica Nedic, Aleksandar Dekanski +3
This paper aims at providing a statistical model for the preferred behavior of authors submitting a paper to a scientific journal. The electronic submission of (about 600) papers t…
Day of the week effect in paper submission/acceptance/rejection to/in/by peer review journals
Marcel Ausloos, Olgica Nedic, Aleksandar Dekanski
This paper aims at providing an introduction to the behavior of authors submitting a paper to a scientific journal. Dates of electronic submission of papers to the Journal of the S…
Quantifying the quality of peer reviewers through Zipf's law
Marcel Ausloos, Olgica Nedic, Agata Fronczak +1
This paper introduces a statistical and other analysis of peer reviewers in order to approach their "quality" through some quantification measure, thereby leading to some quality m…
Review times in peer review: quantitative analysis of editorial workflows
Maciej J. Mrowinski, Agata Fronczak, Piotr Fronczak +2
We examine selected aspects of peer review and suggest possible improvements. To this end, we analyse a dataset containing information about 300 papers submitted to the Biochemistr…