Counting papers with at most 25 authors, so collaboration author lists do not stand in for the people here.
- Sapienza University of RomeIT416 papers
- Institute for Complex SystemsIT322 papers
- Centre National de la Recherche ScientifiqueFR227 papers
- University of Rome Tor VergataIT202 papers
- University of PisaIT173 papers
- University of FlorenceIT157 papers
- Istituto Officina dei MaterialiIT150 papers
- Scuola Internazionale Superiore di Studi AvanzatiIT135 papers
- National Institute of OpticsIT122 papers
- Istituto Nazionale di Fisica NucleareIT117 papers
- Politecnico di MilanoIT111 papers
- Istituto di Analisi dei Sistemi ed Informatica Antonio RubertiIT103 papers
9 papers · 2 filters
The balance of knowledge flows
Giovanni Abramo, Ciriaco Andrea D'Angelo, Massimiliano Carloni
In analogy to the technology balance of payments, in this paper we propose a possible way to set up a "balance of knowledge flows" (BKF), recording world flows of knowledge within…
Predicting long-term publication impact through a combination of early citations and journal impact factor
Giovanni Abramo, Ciriaco Andrea D'Angelo, Giovanni Felici
The ability to predict the long-term impact of a scientific article soon after its publication is of great value towards accurate assessment of research performance. In this work w…
The collaboration behavior of top scientists
Giovanni Abramo, Ciriaco Andrea D'Angelo, Flavia Di Costa
The intention of this work is to analyze top scientists' collaboration behavior at the "international", "domestic extramural" and "intramural" levels, and compare it to that of the…
A nation's foreign and domestic professors: which have better research performance? (The Italian case)
Giovanni Abramo, Ciriaco Andrea D'Angelo, Flavia Di Costa
This work investigates the research performance of foreign faculty in the Italian academic system. Incoming professors compose l'1% of total faculty across the sciences, although w…
Peer review vs bibliometrics: which method better predicts the scholarly impact of publications?
Giovanni Abramo, Ciriaco Andrea D'Angelo, Emanuela Reale
In this work, we try to answer the question of which method, peer review vs bibliometrics, better predicts the future overall scholarly impact of scientific publications. We measur…
Diversification versus specialization in scientific research: which strategy pays off?
Giovanni Abramo, Ciriaco Andrea D'Angelo, Flavia Di Costa
The current work addresses a theme previously unexplored in the literature: that of whether the results arising from research activity in fields other than the scientist's pri-mary…
A gender analysis of top scientists' collaboration behavior: evidence from Italy
Giovanni Abramo, Ciriaco Andrea D'Angelo, Flavia Di Costa
This work analyzes the differences in collaboration behavior between males and females among a particular type of scholars: top scientists, and as compared to non top scientists. T…
Authorship analysis of specialized vs diversified research output
Giovanni Abramo, Ciriaco Andrea D'Angelo, Flavia Di Costa
The present work investigates the relations between amplitude and type of collaboration (intramural, extramural domestic or international) and output of specialized versus diversif…
The practice of self-citations: a longitudinal study
Silvio Peroni, Paolo Ciancarini, Aldo Gangemi +3
In this article, we discuss the outcomes of an experiment where we analysed whether and to what extent the introduction, in 2012, of the new research assessment exercise in Italy (…