activity
20162025
most citedAnalysis of cause-effect inference by comparing regression errors

36 citations · 51 across the 10 of their papers we have counts for

collaborators

10 papers

cs.LG2025

Debiasing Reward Models by Representation Learning with Guarantees

Ignavier Ng, Patrick Blöbaum, Siddharth Bhandari +2

Recent alignment techniques, such as reinforcement learning from human feedback, have been widely adopted to align large language models with human preferences by learning and leve…

cs.LG2025

From Guess2Graph: When and How Can Unreliable Experts Safely Boost Causal Discovery in Finite Samples?

Sujai Hiremath, Dominik Janzing, Philipp Faller +4

Causal discovery algorithms often perform poorly with limited samples. While integrating expert knowledge (including from LLMs) as constraints promises to improve performance, guar…

cs.LG2025

Causal vs. Anticausal merging of predictors

Sergio Hernan Garrido Mejia, Patrick Blöbaum, Bernhard Schölkopf +1

We study the differences arising from merging predictors in the causal and anticausal directions using the same data. In particular we study the asymmetries that arise in a simple…

cs.LG2023

Beyond Single-Feature Importance with ICECREAM

Michael Oesterle, Patrick Blöbaum, Atalanti A. Mastakouri +1

Which set of features was responsible for a certain output of a machine learning model? Which components caused the failure of a cloud computing application? These are just two exa…

stat.ML2023

Manifold Restricted Interventional Shapley Values

Muhammad Faaiz Taufiq, Patrick Blöbaum, Lenon Minorics

Shapley values are model-agnostic methods for explaining model predictions. Many commonly used methods of computing Shapley values, known as off-manifold methods, rely on model eva…

stat.ML2023★ 4 cited

Modeling Causal Mechanisms with Diffusion Models for Interventional and Counterfactual Queries

Patrick Chao, Patrick Blöbaum, Sapan Patel +1

We consider the problem of answering observational, interventional, and counterfactual queries in a causally sufficient setting where only observational data and the causal graph a…

stat.ME2022★ 2 cited

Testing Granger Non-Causality in Panels with Cross-Sectional Dependencies

Lenon Minorics, Caner Turkmen, David Kernert +3

This paper proposes a new approach for testing Granger non-causality on panel data. Instead of aggregating panel member statistics, we aggregate their corresponding p-values and sh…

cs.AI2018★ 36 cited

Analysis of cause-effect inference by comparing regression errors

Patrick Blöbaum, Dominik Janzing, Takashi Washio +2

We address the problem of inferring the causal direction between two variables by comparing the least-squares errors of the predictions in both possible directions. Under the assum…

stat.ML2017★ 2 cited

Estimation of interventional effects of features on prediction

Patrick Blöbaum, Shohei Shimizu

The interpretability of prediction mechanisms with respect to the underlying prediction problem is often unclear. While several studies have focused on developing prediction models…

cs.AI2016★ 7 cited

Error Asymmetry in Causal and Anticausal Regression

Patrick Blöbaum, Takashi Washio, Shohei Shimizu

It is generally difficult to make any statements about the expected prediction error in an univariate setting without further knowledge about how the data were generated. Recent wo…