activity
20152026
most citedRNNs as psycholinguistic subjects: Syntactic state and grammatical dependency

40 citations · 100 across the 20 of their papers we have counts for

collaborators

29 papers

cs.CL2026

Not-So-Strange Love: Language Models and Generative Linguistic Theories are More Compatible than They Appear

R. Thomas McCoy

Futrell and Mahowald (2025) frame the success of neural language models (LMs) as supporting gradient, usage-based linguistic theories. I argue that LMs can also instantiate theorie…

cs.CL2026

You Can't Fight in Here! This is BBS!

Richard Futrell, Kyle Mahowald

Norm, the formal theoretical linguist, and Claudette, the computational language scientist, have a lovely time discussing whether modern language models can inform important questi…

cs.CL2026

Across the Levels of Analysis: Explaining Predictive Processing in Humans Requires More Than Machine-Estimated Probabilities

Sathvik Nair, Colin Phillips

Under the lens of Marr's levels of analysis, we critique and extend two claims about language models (LMs) and language processing: first, that predicting upcoming linguistic infor…

cs.CL2026

Are Language Models Models?

Philip Resnik

Futrell and Mahowald claim LMs "serve as model systems", but an assessment at each of Marr's three levels suggests the claim is clearly not true at the implementation level, poorly…

cs.CL2025

Linguists should learn to love speech-based deep learning models

Marianne de Heer Kloots, Paul Boersma, Willem Zuidema

Futrell and Mahowald present a useful framework bridging technology-oriented deep learning systems and explanation-oriented linguistic theories. Unfortunately, the target article's…

cs.CL2025

Large language models are not about natural language

Johan J. Bolhuis, Andrea Moro, Stephen Crain +1

Large Language Models are useless for linguistics, as they are probabilistic models that require a vast amount of data to analyse externalized strings of words. In contrast, human…

cs.CL2025

Language models as tools for investigating the distinction between possible and impossible natural languages

Julie Kallini, Christopher Potts

We argue that language models (LMs) have strong potential as investigative tools for probing the distinction between possible and impossible natural languages and thus uncovering t…

cs.CL2025★ 13 cited

How Linguistics Learned to Stop Worrying and Love the Language Models

Richard Futrell, Kyle Mahowald

Language models can produce fluent, grammatical text. Nonetheless, some maintain that language models don't really learn language and also that, even if they did, that would not be…

cs.CL2024★ 1 cited

Mission: Impossible Language Models

Julie Kallini, Isabel Papadimitriou, Richard Futrell +2

Chomsky and others have very directly claimed that large language models (LLMs) are equally capable of learning languages that are possible and impossible for humans to learn. Howe…

cs.CL2023

A Cross-Linguistic Pressure for Uniform Information Density in Word Order

Thomas Hikaru Clark, Clara Meister, Tiago Pimentel +4

While natural languages differ widely in both canonical word order and word order flexibility, their word orders still follow shared cross-linguistic statistical patterns, often at…

cs.CL2023★ 2 cited

Analogy in Contact: Modeling Maltese Plural Inflection

Sara Court, Andrea D. Sims, Micha Elsner

Maltese is often described as having a hybrid morphological system resulting from extensive contact between Semitic and Romance language varieties. Such a designation reflects an e…

cs.CL2022★ 1 cited

A unified information-theoretic model of EEG signatures of human language processing

Jiaxuan Li, Richard Futrell

We advance an information-theoretic model of human language processing in the brain, in which incoming linguistic input is processed at two levels, in terms of a heuristic interpre…

cs.CL2022★ 4 cited

When classifying grammatical role, BERT doesn't care about word order... except when it matters

Isabel Papadimitriou, Richard Futrell, Kyle Mahowald

Because meaning can often be inferred from lexical semantics alone, word order is often a redundant cue in natural language. For example, the words chopped, chef, and onion are mor…

cs.CL2022★ 6 cited

Grammatical cues to subjecthood are redundant in a majority of simple clauses across languages

Kyle Mahowald, Evgeniia Diachek, Edward Gibson +2

Grammatical cues are sometimes redundant with word meanings in natural language. For instance, English word order rules constrain the word order of a sentence like "The dog chewed…

cs.CL2021

Sensitivity as a Complexity Measure for Sequence Classification Tasks

Michael Hahn, Dan Jurafsky, Richard Futrell

We introduce a theoretical framework for understanding and predicting the complexity of sequence classification tasks, using a novel extension of the theory of Boolean function sen…

cs.CL2021

Deep Subjecthood: Higher-Order Grammatical Features in Multilingual BERT

Isabel Papadimitriou, Ethan A. Chi, Richard Futrell +1

We investigate how Multilingual BERT (mBERT) encodes grammar by examining how the high-order grammatical feature of morphosyntactic alignment (how different languages define what c…

cs.CL2020

Predicting cross-linguistic adjective order with information gain

William Dyer, Richard Futrell, Zoey Liu +1

Languages vary in their placement of multiple adjectives before, after, or surrounding the noun, but they typically exhibit strong intra-language tendencies on the relative order o…

cs.CL2020

Structural Supervision Improves Few-Shot Learning and Syntactic Generalization in Neural Language Models

Ethan Wilcox, Peng Qian, Richard Futrell +3

Humans can learn structural properties about a word from minimal experience, and deploy their learned syntactic representations uniformly in different grammatical contexts. We asse…

q-bio.NC2020

An information-theoretic account of semantic interference in word production

Richard Futrell

I present a computational-level model of semantic interference effects in word production. Word production is cast as a rate-distortion problem where an agent selects words to mini…

cs.CL2019

Hierarchical Representation in Neural Language Models: Suppression and Recovery of Expectations

Ethan Wilcox, Roger Levy, Richard Futrell

Deep learning sequence models have led to a marked increase in performance for a range of Natural Language Processing tasks, but it remains an open question whether they are able t…

cs.CL2019★ 14 cited

What Syntactic Structures block Dependencies in RNN Language Models?

Ethan Wilcox, Roger Levy, Richard Futrell

Recurrent Neural Networks (RNNs) trained on a language modeling task have been shown to acquire a number of non-local grammatical dependencies with some success. Here, we provide n…

cs.CL2019★ 4 cited

Structural Supervision Improves Learning of Non-Local Grammatical Dependencies

Ethan Wilcox, Peng Qian, Richard Futrell +2

State-of-the-art LSTM language models trained on large corpora learn sequential contingencies in impressive detail and have been shown to acquire a number of non-local grammatical…

cs.CL2019★ 12 cited

Neural Language Models as Psycholinguistic Subjects: Representations of Syntactic State

Richard Futrell, Ethan Wilcox, Takashi Morita +3

We deploy the methods of controlled psycholinguistic experimentation to shed light on the extent to which the behavior of neural network language models reflects incremental repres…

cs.CL2018★ 2 cited

Do RNNs learn human-like abstract word order preferences?

Richard Futrell, Roger P. Levy

RNN language models have achieved state-of-the-art results on various tasks, but what exactly they are representing about syntax is as yet unclear. Here we investigate whether RNN…