activity
20162025
most citedA Survey on Sentiment and Emotion Analysis for Computational Literary Studies

63 citations · 345 across the 53 of their papers we have counts for

collaborators

60 papers

cs.CL2025

Categorical Emotions or Appraisals - Which Emotion Model Explains Argument Convincingness Better?

Lynn Greschner, Meike Bauer, Sabine Weber +1

The convincingness of an argument does not only depend on its structure (logos), the person who makes the argument (ethos), but also on the emotion that it causes in the recipient…

cs.CL2025

Emotionally Charged, Logically Blurred: AI-driven Emotional Framing Impairs Human Fallacy Detection

Yanran Chen, Lynn Greschner, Roman Klinger +2

Logical fallacies are common in public communication and can mislead audiences; fallacious arguments may still appear convincing despite lacking soundness, because convincingness i…

cs.CL2025

Trust Me, I Can Convince You: The Contextualized Argument Appraisal Framework

Lynn Greschner, Sabine Weber, Roman Klinger

Emotions that somebody develops based on an argument do not only depend on the argument itself - they are also influenced by a subjective evaluation of the argument's potential imp…

cs.CL2025

Disambiguation of Emotion Annotations by Contextualizing Events in Plausible Narratives

Johannes Schäfer, Roman Klinger

Ambiguity in emotion analysis stems both from potentially missing information and the subjectivity of interpreting a text. The latter did receive substantial attention, but can we…

cs.CL2025

What if Deception Cannot be Detected? A Cross-Linguistic Study on the Limits of Deception Detection from Text

Aswathy Velutharambath, Kai Sassenberg, Roman Klinger

Can deception be detected solely from written text? Cues of deceptive communication are inherently subtle, even more so in text-only communication. Yet, prior studies have reported…

cs.CL2024

Self-Adaptive Paraphrasing and Preference Learning for Improved Claim Verifiability

Amelie Wührl, Roman Klinger

In fact-checking, structure and phrasing of claims critically influence a model's ability to predict verdicts accurately. Social media content in particular rarely serves as optima…

cs.CL2024★ 1 cited

Fearful Falcons and Angry Llamas: Emotion Category Annotations of Arguments by Humans and LLMs

Lynn Greschner, Roman Klinger

Arguments evoke emotions, influencing the effect of the argument itself. Not only the emotional intensity but also the category influence the argument's effects, for instance, the…

cs.CL2024

Which Demographics do LLMs Default to During Annotation?

Johannes Schäfer, Aidan Combs, Christopher Bagdon +9

Demographics and cultural background of annotators influence the labels they assign in text annotation -- for instance, an elderly woman might find it offensive to read a message a…

cs.CL2024

How Entangled is Factuality and Deception in German?

Aswathy Velutharambath, Amelie Wührl, Roman Klinger

The statement "The earth is flat" is factually inaccurate, but if someone truly believes and argues in its favor, it is not deceptive. Research on deception detection and fact chec…

cs.CL2024

Can Factual Statements be Deceptive? The DeFaBel Corpus of Belief-based Deception

Aswathy Velutharambath, Amelie Wührl, Roman Klinger

If a person firmly believes in a non-factual statement, such as "The Earth is flat", and argues in its favor, there is no inherent intention to deceive. As the argumentation stems…

cs.CL2024

Understanding Fine-grained Distortions in Reports of Scientific Findings

Amelie Wührl, Dustin Wright, Roman Klinger +1

Distorted science communication harms individuals and society as it can lead to unhealthy behavior change and decrease trust in scientific institutions. Given the rapidly increasin…

cs.CL2024

What Makes Medical Claims (Un)Verifiable? Analyzing Entity and Relation Properties for Fact Verification

Amelie Wührl, Yarik Menchaca Resendiz, Lara Grimminger +1

Biomedical claim verification fails if no evidence can be discovered. In these cases, the fact-checking verdict remains unknown and the claim is unverifiable. To improve upon this,…

cs.CL2023★ 1 cited

Emotion-Conditioned Text Generation through Automatic Prompt Optimization

Yarik Menchaca Resendiz, Roman Klinger

Conditional natural language generation methods often require either expensive fine-tuning or training a large language model from scratch. Both are unlikely to lead to good result…

cs.CL2023

Affective Natural Language Generation of Event Descriptions through Fine-grained Appraisal Conditions

Yarik Menchaca Resendiz, Roman Klinger

Models for affective text generation have shown a remarkable progress, but they commonly rely only on basic emotion theories or valance/arousal values as conditions. This is approp…

cs.CL2023

UNIDECOR: A Unified Deception Corpus for Cross-Corpus Deception Detection

Aswathy Velutharambath, Roman Klinger

Verbal deception has been studied in psychology, forensics, and computational linguistics for a variety of reasons, like understanding behaviour patterns, identifying false testimo…

cs.CL2023★ 1 cited

Automatic Emotion Experiencer Recognition

Maximilian Wegge, Roman Klinger

The most prominent subtask in emotion analysis is emotion classification; to assign a category to a textual unit, for instance a social media post. Many research questions from the…

cs.CL2023

An Entity-based Claim Extraction Pipeline for Real-world Biomedical Fact-checking

Amelie Wührl, Lara Grimminger, Roman Klinger

Existing fact-checking models for biomedical claims are typically trained on synthetic or well-worded data and hardly transfer to social media content. This mismatch can be mitigat…

cs.CL2022

Experiencer-Specific Emotion and Appraisal Prediction

Maximilian Wegge, Enrica Troiano, Laura Oberländer +1

Emotion classification in NLP assigns emotions to texts, such as sentences or paragraphs. With texts like "I felt guilty when he cried", focusing on the sentence level disregards t…

cs.CL2022★ 7 cited

Entity-based Claim Representation Improves Fact-Checking of Medical Content in Tweets

Amelie Wührl, Roman Klinger

False medical information on social media poses harm to people's health. While the need for biomedical fact-checking has been recognized in recent years, user-generated medical con…

cs.CL2022★ 14 cited

Natural Language Inference Prompts for Zero-shot Emotion Classification in Text across Corpora

Flor Miriam Plaza-del-Arco, María-Teresa Martín-Valdivia, Roman Klinger

Within textual emotion classification, the set of relevant labels depends on the domain and application scenario and might not be known at the time of model development. This confl…

cs.CL2022★ 47 cited

Dimensional Modeling of Emotions in Text with Appraisal Theories: Corpus Creation, Annotation Reliability, and Prediction

Enrica Troiano, Laura Oberländer, Roman Klinger

The most prominent tasks in emotion analysis are to assign emotions to texts and to understand how emotions manifest in language. An observation for NLP is that emotions can be com…

cs.CL2022

CoVERT: A Corpus of Fact-checked Biomedical COVID-19 Tweets

Isabelle Mohr, Amelie Wührl, Roman Klinger

Over the course of the COVID-19 pandemic, large volumes of biomedical information concerning this new disease have been published on social media. Some of this information can pose…

cs.CL2022

Recovering Patient Journeys: A Corpus of Biomedical Entities and Relations on Twitter (BEAR)

Amelie Wührl, Roman Klinger

Text mining and information extraction for the medical domain has focused on scientific text generated by researchers. However, their direct access to individual patient experience…

cs.CL2022

x-enVENT: A Corpus of Event Descriptions with Experiencer-specific Emotion and Appraisal Annotations

Enrica Troiano, Laura Oberländer, Maximilian Wegge +1

Emotion classification is often formulated as the task to categorize texts into a predefined set of emotion classes. So far, this task has been the recognition of the emotion of wr…