9 citations · 9 across the 1 of their papers we have counts for
4 papers
Criteria for assessing grant applications: A systematic review
Sven E. Hug, Mirjam Aeschbach
Criteria are an essential component of any procedure for assessing merit. Yet, little is known about the criteria peers use in assessing grant applications. In this systematic revi…
Bibliometrics-based heuristics: What is their definition and how can they be studied?
Lutz Bornmann, Sven Hug
When scientists study the phenomena they are interested in, they apply sound methods and base their work on theoretical considerations. In contrast, when the fruits of their resear…
The concordance of field-normalized scores based on Web of Science and Microsoft Academic data: A case study in computer sciences
Thomas Scheidsteger, Robin Haunschild, Sven Hug +1
In order to assess Microsoft Academic as a useful data source for evaluative bibliometrics it is crucial to know, if citation counts from Microsoft Academic could be used in common…
The number of linked references of publications in Microsoft Academic in comparison with the Web of Science
Robin Haunschild, Sven E. Hug, Martin P. Brändle +1
In the context of a comprehensive Microsoft Academic (MA) study, we explored in an initial step the quality of linked references data in MA in comparison with Web of Science (WoS).…