2 citations · 4 across the 3 of their papers we have counts for
6 papers
Abstract Interpretation in Formal Argumentation: with a Galois Connection for Abstract Dialectical Frameworks and May-Must Argumentation (First Report)
Ryuta Arisaka, Takayuki Ito
Labelling-based formal argumentation relies on labelling functions that typically assign one of 3 labels to indicate either acceptance, rejection, or else undecided-to-be-either, t…
Evaluating the Communication Efficiency in Federated Learning Algorithms
Muhammad Asad, Ahmed Moustafa, Takayuki Ito +1
In the era of advanced technologies, mobile devices are equipped with computing and sensing capabilities that gather excessive amounts of data. These amounts of data are suitable f…
Numerical Abstract Persuasion Argumentation for Expressing Concurrent Multi-Agent Negotiations
Ryuta Arisaka, Takayuki Ito
A negotiation process by 2 agents e1 and e2 can be interleaved by another negotiation process between, say, e1 and e3. The interleaving may alter the resource allocation assumed at…
Broadening Label-based Argumentation Semantics with May-Must Scales (May-Must Argumentation)
Ryuta Arisaka, Takayuki Ito
The semantics as to which set of arguments in a given argumentation graph may be acceptable (acceptability semantics) can be characterised in a few different ways. Among them, labe…
Formulating Manipulable Argumentation with Intra-/Inter-Agent Preferences
Ryuta Arisaka, Makoto Hagiwara, Takayuki Ito
From marketing to politics, exploitation of incomplete information through selective communication of arguments is ubiquitous. In this work, we focus on development of an argumenta…
An Ontology to support automated negotiation
Susel Fernandez, Takayuki Ito
In this work we propose an ontology to support automated negotiation in multiagent systems. The ontology can be connected with some domain-specific ontologies to facilitate the neg…