activity
20172019
most citedThe (Un)reliability of saliency methods

165 citations · 178 across the 2 of their papers we have counts for

collaborators

5 papers

cs.AI201913 cited

Explaining Explanations to Society

Leilani H. Gilpin, Cecilia Testart, Nathaniel Fruchter +1

There is a disconnect between explanatory artificial intelligence (XAI) methods and the types of explanations that are useful for and demanded by society (policy makers, government…

cs.CV2018

Local Explanation Methods for Deep Neural Networks Lack Sensitivity to Parameter Values

Julius Adebayo, Justin Gilmer, Ian Goodfellow +1

Explaining the output of a complicated machine learning model like a deep neural network (DNN) is a central challenge in machine learning. Several proposed local explanation method…

cs.CV2018

Sanity Checks for Saliency Maps

Julius Adebayo, Justin Gilmer, Michael Muelly +3

Saliency methods have emerged as a popular tool to highlight features in an input deemed relevant for the prediction of a learned model. Several saliency methods have been proposed…

cs.LG2018

Investigating Human + Machine Complementarity for Recidivism Predictions

Sarah Tan, Julius Adebayo, Kori Inkpen +1

When might human input help (or not) when assessing risk in fairness domains? Dressel and Farid (2018) asked Mechanical Turk workers to evaluate a subset of defendants in the ProPu…

stat.ML2017165 cited

The (Un)reliability of saliency methods

Pieter-Jan Kindermans, Sara Hooker, Julius Adebayo +5

Saliency methods aim to explain the predictions of deep neural networks. These methods lack reliability when the explanation is sensitive to factors that do not contribute to the m…