activity
20162023
most citedQA Dataset Explosion: A Taxonomy of NLP Resources for Question Answering and Reading Comprehension

161 citations · 656 across the 43 of their papers we have counts for

collaborators
Showing cs.CLShow all

51 papers · 1 filter

cs.CL2023★ 1 cited

Coverage-based Example Selection for In-Context Learning

Shivanshu Gupta, Matt Gardner, Sameer Singh

In-context learning (ICL), the ability of large language models to perform novel tasks by conditioning on a prompt with a few task examples, requires these examples to be informati…

cs.CL2022★ 7 cited

Successive Prompting for Decomposing Complex Questions

Dheeru Dua, Shivanshu Gupta, Sameer Singh +1

Answering complex questions that require making latent decisions is a challenging task, especially when limited supervision is available. Recent works leverage the capabilities of…

cs.CL2022★ 2 cited

CONDAQA: A Contrastive Reading Comprehension Dataset for Reasoning about Negation

Abhilasha Ravichander, Matt Gardner, Ana Marasović

The full power of human language-based communication cannot be realized without negation. All human languages have some form of negation. Despite this, negation remains a challengi…

cs.CL2022

When to Use Multi-Task Learning vs Intermediate Fine-Tuning for Pre-Trained Encoder Transfer Learning

Orion Weller, Kevin Seppi, Matt Gardner

Transfer learning (TL) in natural language processing (NLP) has seen a surge of interest in recent years, as pre-trained models have shown an impressive ability to transfer to nove…

cs.CL2022★ 2 cited

Generating Data to Mitigate Spurious Correlations in Natural Language Inference Datasets

Yuxiang Wu, Matt Gardner, Pontus Stenetorp +1

Natural language processing models often exploit spurious correlations between task-independent features and labels in datasets to perform well only within the distributions they a…

cs.CL2022

Structurally Diverse Sampling for Sample-Efficient Training and Comprehensive Evaluation

Shivanshu Gupta, Sameer Singh, Matt Gardner

A growing body of research has demonstrated the inability of NLP models to generalize compositionally and has tried to alleviate it through specialized architectures, training sche…

cs.CL2022★ 52 cited

Impact of Pretraining Term Frequencies on Few-Shot Reasoning

Yasaman Razeghi, Robert L. Logan, Matt Gardner +1

Pretrained Language Models (LMs) have demonstrated ability to perform numerical reasoning by extrapolating from a few examples in few-shot settings. However, the extent to which th…

cs.CL2021

Evidentiality-guided Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Tasks

Akari Asai, Matt Gardner, Hannaneh Hajishirzi

Retrieval-augmented generation models have shown state-of-the-art performance across many knowledge-intensive NLP tasks such as open question answering and fact verification. These…

cs.CL2021

COVR: A test-bed for Visually Grounded Compositional Generalization with real images

Ben Bogin, Shivanshu Gupta, Matt Gardner +1

While interest in models that generalize at test time to new compositions has risen in recent years, benchmarks in the visually-grounded domain have thus far been restricted to syn…

cs.CL2021

Enforcing Consistency in Weakly Supervised Semantic Parsing

Nitish Gupta, Sameer Singh, Matt Gardner

The predominant challenge in weakly supervised semantic parsing is that of spurious programs that evaluate to correct answers for the wrong reasons. Prior work uses elaborate searc…

cs.CL2021★ 161 cited

QA Dataset Explosion: A Taxonomy of NLP Resources for Question Answering and Reading Comprehension

Anna Rogers, Matt Gardner, Isabelle Augenstein

Alongside huge volumes of research on deep learning models in NLP in the recent years, there has been also much work on benchmark datasets needed to track modeling progress. Questi…

cs.CL2021

Tailor: Generating and Perturbing Text with Semantic Controls

Alexis Ross, Tongshuang Wu, Hao Peng +2

Controlled text perturbation is useful for evaluating and improving model generalizability. However, current techniques rely on training a model for every target perturbation, whic…

cs.CL2021

A Dataset of Information-Seeking Questions and Answers Anchored in Research Papers

Pradeep Dasigi, Kyle Lo, Iz Beltagy +3

Readers of academic research papers often read with the goal of answering specific questions. Question Answering systems that can answer those questions can make consumption of the…

cs.CL2021

Generative Context Pair Selection for Multi-hop Question Answering

Dheeru Dua, Cicero Nogueira dos Santos, Patrick Ng +4

Compositional reasoning tasks like multi-hop question answering, require making latent decisions to get the final answer, given a question. However, crowdsourced datasets often cap…

cs.CL2021

Learning with Instance Bundles for Reading Comprehension

Dheeru Dua, Pradeep Dasigi, Sameer Singh +1

When training most modern reading comprehension models, all the questions associated with a context are treated as being independent from each other. However, closely related quest…

cs.CL2021

Paired Examples as Indirect Supervision in Latent Decision Models

Nitish Gupta, Sameer Singh, Matt Gardner +1

Compositional, structured models are appealing because they explicitly decompose problems and provide interpretable intermediate outputs that give confidence that the model is not…

cs.CL2021★ 10 cited

Documenting Large Webtext Corpora: A Case Study on the Colossal Clean Crawled Corpus

Jesse Dodge, Maarten Sap, Ana Marasović +5

Large language models have led to remarkable progress on many NLP tasks, and researchers are turning to ever-larger text corpora to train them. Some of the largest corpora availabl…

cs.CL2021

Competency Problems: On Finding and Removing Artifacts in Language Data

Matt Gardner, William Merrill, Jesse Dodge +4

Much recent work in NLP has documented dataset artifacts, bias, and spurious correlations between input features and output labels. However, how to tell which features have "spurio…

cs.CL2021★ 1 cited

Mitigating False-Negative Contexts in Multi-document Question Answering with Retrieval Marginalization

Ansong Ni, Matt Gardner, Pradeep Dasigi

Question Answering (QA) tasks requiring information from multiple documents often rely on a retrieval model to identify relevant information for reasoning. The retrieval model is t…

cs.CL2020

Learning from Task Descriptions

Orion Weller, Nicholas Lourie, Matt Gardner +1

Typically, machine learning systems solve new tasks by training on thousands of examples. In contrast, humans can solve new tasks by reading some instructions, with perhaps an exam…

cs.CL2020★ 1 cited

IIRC: A Dataset of Incomplete Information Reading Comprehension Questions

James Ferguson, Matt Gardner, Hannaneh Hajishirzi +2

Humans often have to read multiple documents to address their information needs. However, most existing reading comprehension (RC) tasks only focus on questions for which the conte…

cs.CL2020★ 21 cited

MOCHA: A Dataset for Training and Evaluating Generative Reading Comprehension Metrics

Anthony Chen, Gabriel Stanovsky, Sameer Singh +1

Posing reading comprehension as a generation problem provides a great deal of flexibility, allowing for open-ended questions with few restrictions on possible answers. However, pro…

cs.CL2020

Improving Compositional Generalization in Semantic Parsing

Inbar Oren, Jonathan Herzig, Nitish Gupta +2

Generalization of models to out-of-distribution (OOD) data has captured tremendous attention recently. Specifically, compositional generalization, i.e., whether a model generalizes…

cs.CL2020★ 2 cited

Understanding Mention Detector-Linker Interaction in Neural Coreference Resolution

Zhaofeng Wu, Matt Gardner

Despite significant recent progress in coreference resolution, the quality of current state-of-the-art systems still considerably trails behind human-level performance. Using the C…