activity
20172022
most citedAn interpretable classifier for high-resolution breast cancer screening images utilizing weakly supervised localization

17 citations · 27 across the 5 of their papers we have counts for

collaborators
Showing eess.IVShow all

5 papers · 1 filter

eess.IV2022

Best Practices and Scoring System on Reviewing A.I. based Medical Imaging Papers: Part 1 Classification

Timothy L. Kline, Felipe Kitamura, Ian Pan +12

With the recent advances in A.I. methodologies and their application to medical imaging, there has been an explosion of related research programs utilizing these techniques to prod…

eess.IV20202 cited

Differences between human and machine perception in medical diagnosis

Taro Makino, Stanislaw Jastrzebski, Witold Oleszkiewicz +18

Deep neural networks (DNNs) show promise in image-based medical diagnosis, but cannot be fully trusted since their performance can be severely degraded by dataset shifts to which h…

eess.IV20202 cited

Reducing false-positive biopsies with deep neural networks that utilize local and global information in screening mammograms

Nan Wu, Zhe Huang, Yiqiu Shen +8

Breast cancer is the most common cancer in women, and hundreds of thousands of unnecessary biopsies are done around the world at a tremendous cost. It is crucial to reduce the rate…

eess.IV2019

Improving localization-based approaches for breast cancer screening exam classification

Thibault Févry, Jason Phang, Nan Wu +4

We trained and evaluated a localization-based deep CNN for breast cancer screening exam classification on over 200,000 exams (over 1,000,000 images). Our model achieves an AUC of 0…

eess.IV2019

Screening Mammogram Classification with Prior Exams

Jungkyu Park, Jason Phang, Yiqiu Shen +5

Radiologists typically compare a patient's most recent breast cancer screening exam to their previous ones in making informed diagnoses. To reflect this practice, we propose new ne…