activity
20172026
most citedAI Safety Gridworlds

117 citations · 303 across the 19 of their papers we have counts for

collaborators

21 papers

cs.AI2026

AI Finds A Way

Aaron Dharna, Cong Lu, Ryan Sullivan +3

Artificial Intelligence (AI) algorithms frequently learn creative and unexpected solutions, surprising even expert researchers who develop and study them. They often astonish pract…

cs.AI2026

Persuasion Attacks Can Decrease Effectiveness of CoT Monitoring

Jennifer Za, Julija Bainiaksina, Nikita Ostrovsky +2

Chain-of-thought (CoT) monitoring is a promising safety mechanism for AI agents, based on the premise that visible reasoning traces can surface misaligned or deceptive behavior. Wh…

cs.LG2026

Realistic honeypot evaluations for scheming propensity

Victoria Krakovna, David Lindner, Lewis Ho +2

We introduce scheming honeypot evaluations, a framework for testing whether models will pursue instrumental goals if given the opportunity. Our scheming honeypot evaluations take t…

cs.LG2026

Gram: Assessing sabotage propensities via automated alignment auditing

David Lindner, Victoria Krakovna, Sebastian Farquhar

We introduce Gram, an automated alignment auditing framework to assess the propensity of AI agents to engage in sabotage. We evaluate Gemini models across 17 simulated agentic depl…

cs.AI2025★ 2 cited

Chain of Thought Monitorability: A New and Fragile Opportunity for AI Safety

Tomek Korbak, Mikita Balesni, Elizabeth Barnes +38

AI systems that "think" in human language offer a unique opportunity for AI safety: we can monitor their chains of thought (CoT) for the intent to misbehave. Like all other known A…

cs.CL2025★ 49 cited

Gemini 2.5: Pushing the Frontier with Advanced Reasoning, Multimodality, Long Context, and Next Generation Agentic Capabilities

Gheorghe Comanici, Eric Bieber, Mike Schaekermann +3431

In this report, we introduce the Gemini 2.X model family: Gemini 2.5 Pro and Gemini 2.5 Flash, as well as our earlier Gemini 2.0 Flash and Flash-Lite models. Gemini 2.5 Pro is our…

cs.LG2025

Evaluating Frontier Models for Stealth and Situational Awareness

Mary Phuong, Roland S. Zimmermann, Ziyue Wang +6

Recent work has demonstrated the plausibility of frontier AI models scheming -- knowingly and covertly pursuing an objective misaligned with its developer's intentions. Such behavi…

cs.AI2025★ 1 cited

An Approach to Technical AGI Safety and Security

Rohin Shah, Alex Irpan, Alexander Matt Turner +27

Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) promises transformative benefits but also presents significant risks. We develop an approach to address the risk of harms consequential enough…

cs.CY2024★ 51 cited

The Ethics of Advanced AI Assistants

Iason Gabriel, Arianna Manzini, Geoff Keeling +54

This paper focuses on the opportunities and the ethical and societal risks posed by advanced AI assistants. We define advanced AI assistants as artificial agents with natural langu…

cs.LG2024★ 11 cited

Evaluating Frontier Models for Dangerous Capabilities

Mary Phuong, Matthew Aitchison, Elliot Catt +24

To understand the risks posed by a new AI system, we must understand what it can and cannot do. Building on prior work, we introduce a programme of new "dangerous capability" evalu…

cs.AI2024

Limitations of Agents Simulated by Predictive Models

Raymond Douglas, Jacek Karwowski, Chan Bae +2

There is increasing focus on adapting predictive models into agent-like systems, most notably AI assistants based on language models. We outline two structural reasons for why thes…

cs.AI2024

Quantifying stability of non-power-seeking in artificial agents

Evan Ryan Gunter, Yevgeny Liokumovich, Victoria Krakovna

We investigate the question: if an AI agent is known to be safe in one setting, is it also safe in a new setting similar to the first? This is a core question of AI alignment--we t…

cs.AI2023★ 2 cited

Power-seeking can be probable and predictive for trained agents

Victoria Krakovna, Janos Kramar

Power-seeking behavior is a key source of risk from advanced AI, but our theoretical understanding of this phenomenon is relatively limited. Building on existing theoretical result…

cs.LG2022★ 16 cited

Goal Misgeneralization: Why Correct Specifications Aren't Enough For Correct Goals

Rohin Shah, Vikrant Varma, Ramana Kumar +4

The field of AI alignment is concerned with AI systems that pursue unintended goals. One commonly studied mechanism by which an unintended goal might arise is specification gaming,…

cs.LG2020★ 2 cited

Avoiding Tampering Incentives in Deep RL via Decoupled Approval

Jonathan Uesato, Ramana Kumar, Victoria Krakovna +3

How can we design agents that pursue a given objective when all feedback mechanisms are influenceable by the agent? Standard RL algorithms assume a secure reward function, and can…

cs.LG2020★ 3 cited

REALab: An Embedded Perspective on Tampering

Ramana Kumar, Jonathan Uesato, Richard Ngo +3

This paper describes REALab, a platform for embedded agency research in reinforcement learning (RL). REALab is designed to model the structure of tampering problems that may arise…

cs.LG2020★ 18 cited

Avoiding Side Effects By Considering Future Tasks

Victoria Krakovna, Laurent Orseau, Richard Ngo +2

Designing reward functions is difficult: the designer has to specify what to do (what it means to complete the task) as well as what not to do (side effects that should be avoided…

cs.AI2019★ 9 cited

Modeling AGI Safety Frameworks with Causal Influence Diagrams

Tom Everitt, Ramana Kumar, Victoria Krakovna +1

Proposals for safe AGI systems are typically made at the level of frameworks, specifying how the components of the proposed system should be trained and interact with each other. I…

cs.LG2018★ 22 cited

Penalizing side effects using stepwise relative reachability

Victoria Krakovna, Laurent Orseau, Ramana Kumar +2

How can we design safe reinforcement learning agents that avoid unnecessary disruptions to their environment? We show that current approaches to penalizing side effects can introdu…

cs.LG2017★ 117 cited

AI Safety Gridworlds

Jan Leike, Miljan Martic, Victoria Krakovna +5

We present a suite of reinforcement learning environments illustrating various safety properties of intelligent agents. These problems include safe interruptibility, avoiding side…

cs.AI2017

Reinforcement Learning with a Corrupted Reward Channel

Tom Everitt, Victoria Krakovna, Laurent Orseau +2

No real-world reward function is perfect. Sensory errors and software bugs may result in RL agents observing higher (or lower) rewards than they should. For example, a reinforcemen…