activity
20172026
most citedSupporting Human-AI Collaboration in Auditing LLMs with LLMs

73 citations · 135 across the 22 of their papers we have counts for

collaborators

23 papers

cs.CY2026

Quantifying the Salience of Geo-Cultural Values for Pluralistic Safety Alignment

Arkadiy Saakyan, Charvi Rastogi, Lora Aroyo

Safe global deployment of AI models requires alignment with human values that vary across cultures. Yet rater pools in safety evaluation datasets remain largely geographically homo…

cs.CY2026

Going PLACES: Participatory Localized Red Teaming for Text-to-Image Safety in the Global South

Charvi Rastogi, Mukul Bhutani, Minsuk Kahng +13

Despite the global deployment of text-to-image (T2I) models, their safety frameworks are largely calibrated to a Western-centric default, creating significant vulnerabilities for t…

cs.AI2026

Evaluating Language Models for Harmful Manipulation

Canfer Akbulut, Rasmi Elasmar, Abhishek Roy +9

Interest in the concept of AI-driven harmful manipulation is growing, yet current approaches to evaluating it are limited. This paper introduces a framework for evaluating harmful…

cs.LG2025

From Seed to Harvest: Augmenting Human Creativity with AI for Red-teaming Text-to-Image Models

Jessica Quaye, Charvi Rastogi, Alicia Parrish +4

Text-to-image (T2I) models have become prevalent across numerous applications, making their robust evaluation against adversarial attacks a critical priority. Continuous access to…

cs.HC2025

"Just a strange pic": Evaluating 'safety' in GenAI Image safety annotation tasks from diverse annotators' perspectives

Ding Wang, Mark Díaz, Charvi Rastogi +10

Understanding what constitutes safety in AI-generated content is complex. While developers often rely on predefined taxonomies, real-world safety judgments also involve personal, s…

cs.LG2025

Whose View of Safety? A Deep DIVE Dataset for Pluralistic Alignment of Text-to-Image Models

Charvi Rastogi, Tian Huey Teh, Pushkar Mishra +10

Current text-to-image (T2I) models often fail to account for diverse human experiences, leading to misaligned systems. We advocate for pluralistic alignment, where an AI understand…

cs.CY2025

Decoding Safety Feedback from Diverse Raters: A Data-driven Lens on Responsiveness to Severity

Pushkar Mishra, Charvi Rastogi, Stephen R. Pfohl +9

Ensuring the safety of Generative AI requires a nuanced understanding of pluralistic viewpoints. In this paper, we introduce a novel data-driven approach for analyzing ordinal safe…

cs.CL2025★ 8 cited

Multi-turn Evaluation of Anthropomorphic Behaviours in Large Language Models

Lujain Ibrahim, Canfer Akbulut, Rasmi Elasmar +7

The tendency of users to anthropomorphise large language models (LLMs) is of growing interest to AI developers, researchers, and policy-makers. Here, we present a novel method for…

cs.AI2024

Insights on Disagreement Patterns in Multimodal Safety Perception across Diverse Rater Groups

Charvi Rastogi, Tian Huey Teh, Pushkar Mishra +10

AI systems crucially rely on human ratings, but these ratings are often aggregated, obscuring the inherent diversity of perspectives in real-world phenomenon. This is particularly…

cs.CV2024★ 4 cited

Imagen 3

Imagen-Team-Google, :, Jason Baldridge +257

We introduce Imagen 3, a latent diffusion model that generates high quality images from text prompts. We describe our quality and responsibility evaluations. Imagen 3 is preferred…

cs.CY2024

Adversarial Nibbler: An Open Red-Teaming Method for Identifying Diverse Harms in Text-to-Image Generation

Jessica Quaye, Alicia Parrish, Oana Inel +12

With the rise of text-to-image (T2I) generative AI models reaching wide audiences, it is critical to evaluate model robustness against non-obvious attacks to mitigate the generatio…

cs.CY2024

A Randomized Controlled Trial on Anonymizing Reviewers to Each Other in Peer Review Discussions

Charvi Rastogi, Xiangchen Song, Zhijing Jin +4

Peer review often involves reviewers submitting their independent reviews, followed by a discussion among reviewers of each paper. A question among policymakers is whether the revi…

cs.LG2023★ 3 cited

Adversarial Nibbler: A Data-Centric Challenge for Improving the Safety of Text-to-Image Models

Alicia Parrish, Hannah Rose Kirk, Jessica Quaye +10

The generative AI revolution in recent years has been spurred by an expansion in compute power and data quantity, which together enable extensive pre-training of powerful text-to-i…

cs.HC2023★ 73 cited

Supporting Human-AI Collaboration in Auditing LLMs with LLMs

Charvi Rastogi, Marco Tulio Ribeiro, Nicholas King +2

Large language models are becoming increasingly pervasive and ubiquitous in society via deployment in sociotechnical systems. Yet these language models, be it for classification or…

cs.LG2022

How do Authors' Perceptions of their Papers Compare with Co-authors' Perceptions and Peer-review Decisions?

Charvi Rastogi, Ivan Stelmakh, Alina Beygelzimer +7

How do author perceptions match up to the outcomes of the peer-review process and perceptions of others? In a top-tier computer science conference (NeurIPS 2021) with more than 23,…

cs.HC2022★ 5 cited

A Taxonomy of Human and ML Strengths in Decision-Making to Investigate Human-ML Complementarity

Charvi Rastogi, Liu Leqi, Kenneth Holstein +1

Hybrid human-ML systems increasingly make consequential decisions in a wide range of domains. These systems are often introduced with the expectation that the combined human-ML sys…

cs.DL2022★ 19 cited

Cite-seeing and Reviewing: A Study on Citation Bias in Peer Review

Ivan Stelmakh, Charvi Rastogi, Ryan Liu +3

Citations play an important role in researchers' careers as a key factor in evaluation of scientific impact. Many anecdotes advice authors to exploit this fact and cite prospective…

cs.DL2022★ 3 cited

To ArXiv or not to ArXiv: A Study Quantifying Pros and Cons of Posting Preprints Online

Charvi Rastogi, Ivan Stelmakh, Xinwei Shen +4

Double-blind conferences have engaged in debates over whether to allow authors to post their papers online on arXiv or elsewhere during the review process. Independently, some auth…

cs.HC2020★ 5 cited

A Large Scale Randomized Controlled Trial on Herding in Peer-Review Discussions

Ivan Stelmakh, Charvi Rastogi, Nihar B. Shah +2

Peer review is the backbone of academia and humans constitute a cornerstone of this process, being responsible for reviewing papers and making the final acceptance/rejection decisi…

cs.HC2020★ 9 cited

Deciding Fast and Slow: The Role of Cognitive Biases in AI-assisted Decision-making

Charvi Rastogi, Yunfeng Zhang, Dennis Wei +3

Several strands of research have aimed to bridge the gap between artificial intelligence (AI) and human decision-makers in AI-assisted decision-making, where humans are the consume…

stat.ML2020★ 2 cited

Two-Sample Testing on Ranked Preference Data and the Role of Modeling Assumptions

Charvi Rastogi, Sivaraman Balakrishnan, Nihar B. Shah +1

A number of applications require two-sample testing on ranked preference data. For instance, in crowdsourcing, there is a long-standing question of whether pairwise comparison data…

stat.ML2017★ 4 cited

A Spectral Approach for the Design of Experiments: Design, Analysis and Algorithms

Bhavya Kailkhura, Jayaraman J. Thiagarajan, Charvi Rastogi +2

This paper proposes a new approach to construct high quality space-filling sample designs. First, we propose a novel technique to quantify the space-filling property and optimally…

cs.IT2017

Mobile Sensing of Two-Dimensional Bandlimited Fields on Random Paths

Charvi Rastogi, Animesh Kumar

Mobile sensing has been recently proposed for sampling spatial fields, where mobile sensors record the field along various paths for reconstruction. Classical and contemporary samp…