activity
20172026
most citedA Dataset of Peer Reviews (PeerRead): Collection, Insights and NLP Applications

30 citations · 176 across the 66 of their papers we have counts for

collaborators

71 papers

cs.CL2026

Abstain-R1: Calibrated Abstention and Post-Refusal Clarification via Verifiable RL

Skylar Zhai, Jingcheng Liang, Dongyeop Kang

Reinforcement fine-tuning improves the reasoning ability of large language models, but it can also encourage them to answer unanswerable queries by guessing or hallucinating missin…

cs.AI2026

The Amazing Agent Race: Strong Tool Users, Weak Navigators

Zae Myung Kim, Dongseok Lee, Jaehyung Kim +2

Existing tool-use benchmarks for LLM agents are overwhelmingly linear: our analysis of six benchmarks shows 55 to 100% of instances are simple chains of 2 to 5 steps. We introduce…

cs.LG2025

Scaling Unverifiable Rewards: A Case Study on Visual Insights

Shuyu Gan, James Mooney, Pan Hao +4

Large Language Model (LLM) agents can increasingly automate complex reasoning through Test-Time Scaling (TTS), iterative refinement guided by reward signals. However, many real-wor…

cs.LG2025

A2P-Vis: an Analyzer-to-Presenter Agentic Pipeline for Visual Insights Generation and Reporting

Shuyu Gan, Renxiang Wang, James Mooney +1

Automating end-to-end data science pipeline with AI agents still stalls on two gaps: generating insightful, diverse visual evidence and assembling it into a coherent, professional…

cs.CL2025

Mary, the Cheeseburger-Eating Vegetarian: Do LLMs Recognize Incoherence in Narratives?

Karin de Langis, Püren Öncel, Ryan Peters +4

Leveraging a dataset of paired narratives, we investigate the extent to which large language models (LLMs) can reliably separate incoherent and coherent stories. A probing study fi…

cs.CL2025

Tracing How Annotators Think: Augmenting Preference Judgments with Reading Processes

Karin de Langis, William Walker, Khanh Chi Le +1

We propose an annotation approach that captures not only labels but also the reading process underlying annotators' decisions, e.g., what parts of the text they focus on, re-read o…

cs.HC2025

FlowForge: Guiding the Creation of Multi-agent Workflows with Design Space Visualization as a Thinking Scaffold

Pan Hao, Dongyeop Kang, Nicholas Hinds +1

Multi-agent workflows have become an effective strategy for tackling complicated tasks by decomposing them into multiple sub-tasks and assigning them to specialized agents. However…

cs.CL2025

How LLMs Comprehend Temporal Meaning in Narratives: A Case Study in Cognitive Evaluation of LLMs

Karin de Langis, Jong Inn Park, Andreas Schramm +5

Large language models (LLMs) exhibit increasingly sophisticated linguistic capabilities, yet the extent to which these behaviors reflect human-like cognition versus advanced patter…

cs.CL2025

Toward Evaluative Thinking: Meta Policy Optimization with Evolving Reward Models

Zae Myung Kim, Chanwoo Park, Vipul Raheja +2

Reward-based alignment methods for large language models (LLMs) face two key limitations: vulnerability to reward hacking, where models exploit flaws in the reward signal; and reli…

cs.CL2025

Stealing Creator's Workflow: A Creator-Inspired Agentic Framework with Iterative Feedback Loop for Improved Scientific Short-form Generation

Jong Inn Park, Maanas Taneja, Qianwen Wang +1

Generating engaging, accurate short-form videos from scientific papers is challenging due to content complexity and the gap between expert authors and readers. Existing end-to-end…

cs.CL2025

LawFlow: Collecting and Simulating Lawyers' Thought Processes on Business Formation Case Studies

Debarati Das, Khanh Chi Le, Ritik Sachin Parkar +8

Legal practitioners, particularly those early in their careers, face complex, high-stakes tasks that require adaptive, context-sensitive reasoning. While AI holds promise in suppor…

cs.CL2025

Align to Structure: Aligning Large Language Models with Structural Information

Zae Myung Kim, Anand Ramachandran, Farideh Tavazoee +3

Generating long, coherent text remains a challenge for large language models (LLMs), as they lack hierarchical planning and structured organization in discourse generation. We intr…

cs.CL2025

Strong Memory, Weak Control: An Empirical Study of Executive Functioning in LLMs

Karin de Langis, Jong Inn Park, Bin Hu +5

Working memory, or the ability to hold and manipulate information in the mind, is a critical component of human intelligence and executive functioning. It is correlated with perfor…

cs.HC2025

ScholaWrite: A Dataset of End-to-End Scholarly Writing Process

Khanh Chi Le, Linghe Wang, Minhwa Lee +3

Writing is a cognitively demanding activity that requires constant decision-making, heavy reliance on working memory, and frequent shifts between tasks of different goals. To build…

cs.LG2024

Anchors Aweigh! Sail for Optimal Unified Multi-Modal Representations

Minoh Jeong, Zae Myung Kim, Min Namgung +3

A unified representation space in multi-modal learning is essential for effectively integrating diverse data sources, such as text, images, and audio, to enhance efficiency and per…

cs.HC2024

Human-AI Collaborative Taxonomy Construction: A Case Study in Profession-Specific Writing Assistants

Minhwa Lee, Zae Myung Kim, Vivek Khetan +1

Large Language Models (LLMs) have assisted humans in several writing tasks, including text revision and story generation. However, their effectiveness in supporting domain-specific…

cs.CL2024

Confidence Calibration and Rationalization for LLMs via Multi-Agent Deliberation

Ruixin Yang, Dheeraj Rajagopal, Shirley Anugrah Hayati +2

Uncertainty estimation is a significant issue for current large language models (LLMs) that are generally poorly calibrated and over-confident, especially with reinforcement learni…

cs.CL2024

Dynamic Multi-Reward Weighting for Multi-Style Controllable Generation

Karin de Langis, Ryan Koo, Dongyeop Kang

Textual style expresses a diverse set of information, including interpersonal dynamics (e.g., formality) and the author's emotions or attitudes (e.g., disgust). An open question is…

cs.CL2024★ 2 cited

Chain-of-Instructions: Compositional Instruction Tuning on Large Language Models

Shirley Anugrah Hayati, Taehee Jung, Tristan Bodding-Long +4

Fine-tuning large language models (LLMs) with a collection of large and diverse instructions has improved the model's generalization to different tasks, even for unseen tasks. Howe…

cs.CV2024★ 1 cited

II-MMR: Identifying and Improving Multi-modal Multi-hop Reasoning in Visual Question Answering

Jihyung Kil, Farideh Tavazoee, Dongyeop Kang +1

Visual Question Answering (VQA) often involves diverse reasoning scenarios across Vision and Language (V&L). Most prior VQA studies, however, have merely focused on assessing the m…

cs.CL2024

Threads of Subtlety: Detecting Machine-Generated Texts Through Discourse Motifs

Zae Myung Kim, Kwang Hee Lee, Preston Zhu +2

With the advent of large language models (LLM), the line between human-crafted and machine-generated texts has become increasingly blurred. This paper delves into the inquiry of id…

cs.CV2024★ 2 cited

Tuning Large Multimodal Models for Videos using Reinforcement Learning from AI Feedback

Daechul Ahn, Yura Choi, Youngjae Yu +2

Recent advancements in large language models have influenced the development of video large multimodal models (VLMMs). The previous approaches for VLMMs involved Supervised Fine-Tu…

cs.CL2024★ 2 cited

Under the Surface: Tracking the Artifactuality of LLM-Generated Data

Debarati Das, Karin De Langis, Anna Martin-Boyle +14

This work delves into the expanding role of large language models (LLMs) in generating artificial data. LLMs are increasingly employed to create a variety of outputs, including ann…

cs.CL2024★ 1 cited

SelectLLM: Can LLMs Select Important Instructions to Annotate?

Ritik Sachin Parkar, Jaehyung Kim, Jong Inn Park +1

Instruction tuning benefits from large and diverse datasets; however, creating such datasets involves a high cost of human labeling. While synthetic datasets generated by large lan…