5 citations · 9 across the 4 of their papers we have counts for
11 papers
Interface Compliance of Inline Assembly: Automatically Check, Patch and Refine
Frédéric Recoules, Sébastien Bardin, Richard Bonichon +3
Inline assembly is still a common practice in low-level C programming, typically for efficiency reasons or for accessing specific hardware resources. Such embedded assembly codes i…
AI-based Blackbox Code Deobfuscation: Understand, Improve and Mitigate
Grégoire Menguy, Sébastien Bardin, Richard Bonichon +1
Code obfuscation aims at protecting Intellectual Property and other secrets embedded into software from being retrieved. Recent works leverage advances in artificial intelligence w…
No Crash, No Exploit: Automated Verification of Embedded Kernels
Olivier Nicole, Matthieu Lemerre, Sébastien Bardin +1
The kernel is the most safety- and security-critical component of many computer systems, as the most severe bugs lead to complete system crash or exploit. It is thus desirable to g…
Automatically Proving Microkernels Free from Privilege Escalation from their Executable
Olivier Nicole, Matthieu Lemerre, Sébastien Bardin +1
Operating system kernels are the security keystone of most computer systems, as they provide the core protection mechanisms. Kernels are in particular responsible for their own sec…
Binary-level Directed Fuzzing for Use-After-Free Vulnerabilities
Manh-Dung Nguyen, Sébastien Bardin, Richard Bonichon +2
Directed fuzzing focuses on automatically testing specific parts of the code by taking advantage of additional information such as (partial) bug stack trace, patches or risky opera…
Binsec/Rel: Efficient Relational Symbolic Execution for Constant-Time at Binary-Level
Lesly-Ann Daniel, Sébastien Bardin, Tamara Rezk
The constant-time programming discipline (CT) is an efficient countermeasure against timing side-channel attacks, requiring the control flow and the memory accesses to be independe…