36 citations · 114 across the 8 of their papers we have counts for
7 papers · 1 filter
When Is It Acceptable to Break the Rules? Knowledge Representation of Moral Judgement Based on Empirical Data
Edmond Awad, Sydney Levine, Andrea Loreggia +6
One of the most remarkable things about the human moral mind is its flexibility. We can make moral judgments about cases we have never seen before. We can decide that pre-establish…
Blaming humans in autonomous vehicle accidents: Shared responsibility across levels of automation
Edmond Awad, Sydney Levine, Max Kleiman-Weiner +5
When a semi-autonomous car crashes and harms someone, how are blame and causal responsibility distributed across the human and machine drivers? In this article, we consider cases i…
A Computational Model of Commonsense Moral Decision Making
Richard Kim, Max Kleiman-Weiner, Andres Abeliuk +4
We introduce a new computational model of moral decision making, drawing on a recent theory of commonsense moral learning via social dynamics. Our model describes moral dilemmas as…
A Voting-Based System for Ethical Decision Making
Ritesh Noothigattu, Snehalkumar 'Neil' S. Gaikwad, Edmond Awad +4
We present a general approach to automating ethical decisions, drawing on machine learning and computational social choice. In a nutshell, we propose to learn a model of societal p…
Pareto Optimality and Strategy Proofness in Group Argument Evaluation (Extended Version)
Edmond Awad, Martin Caminada, Gabriella Pigozzi +2
An inconsistent knowledge base can be abstracted as a set of arguments and a defeat relation among them. There can be more than one consistent way to evaluate such an argumentation…
Experimental Assessment of Aggregation Principles in Argumentation-enabled Collective Intelligence
Edmond Awad, Jean-François Bonnefon, Martin Caminada +2
On the Web, there is always a need to aggregate opinions from the crowd (as in posts, social networks, forums, etc.). Different mechanisms have been implemented to capture these op…
Judgment Aggregation in Multi-Agent Argumentation
Edmond Awad, Richard Booth, Fernando Tohme +1
Given a set of conflicting arguments, there can exist multiple plausible opinions about which arguments should be accepted, rejected, or deemed undecided. We study the problem of h…