20 citations · 32 across the 5 of their papers we have counts for
5 papers
Towards a Democratic University: A call for Reflexive Evaluation and a Participative Culture
Julia Heuritsch
The extensive focus on performance indicators in research evaluation has been facing critique in science studies. Stemming from a neoliberalist paradigm, metrics allegedly objectif…
Reflexive Behaviour: How publication pressure affects research quality in Astronomy
Julia Heuritsch
Reflexive metrics is a branch of science studies which explores how the demand for accountability and performance measurement in science has shaped the research culture in recent d…
The Evaluation Gap in Astronomy -- Explained through a Rational Choice Framework
Julia Heuritsch
The concept of evaluation gaps captures potential discrepancies between what researchers value about their research, in particular research quality, and what metrics measure. The e…
Knowledge Utilization and Open Science Policies: Noble aims that ensure quality research or Ordering discoveries like a pizza?
Julia Heuritsch
Open Science has been a rising theme in the landscape of science policy in recent years. The goal is to make research that emerges from publicly funded science to become findable,…
Insights into the effects of indicators on knowledge production in Astronomy
Julia Heuritsch
Nine interviews were conducted with astronomers from Leiden University, and a document analysis was performed on relevant institutional (self-) evaluation documents, annual reports…