30 citations · 51 across the 6 of their papers we have counts for
6 papers
A Comparative Study of Some Central Notions of ASPIC+ and DeLP
Alejandro J. Garcia, Henry Prakken, Guillermo R. Simari
This paper formally compares some central notions from two well-known formalisms for rule-based argumentation, DeLP and ASPIC+. The comparisons especially focus on intuitive adequa…
An approach to Decision Making based on Dynamic Argumentation Systems
Edgardo Ferretti, Luciano H. Tamargo, Alejandro J. Garcia +2
In this paper, we introduce a formalism for single-agent decision making that is based on Dynamic Argumentation Frameworks. The formalism can be used to justify a choice, which is…
An Approach to Characterize Graded Entailment of Arguments through a Label-based Framework
Maximiliano C. D. Budán, Gerardo I. Simari, Ignacio Viglizzo +1
Argumentation theory is a powerful paradigm that formalizes a type of commonsense reasoning that aims to simulate the human ability to resolve a specific problem in an intelligent…
A Logic Programming Framework for Possibilistic Argumentation with Vague Knowledge
Carlos Chesnevar, Guillermo Simari, Teresa Alsinet +1
Defeasible argumentation frameworks have evolved to become a sound setting to formalize commonsense, qualitative reasoning from incomplete and potentially inconsistent knowledge. D…
Dynamics of Knowledge in DeLP through Argument Theory Change
Martín O. Moguillansky, Nicolás D. Rotstein, Marcelo A. Falappa +2
This article is devoted to the study of methods to change defeasible logic programs (de.l.p.s) which are the knowledge bases used by the Defeasible Logic Programming (DeLP) interpr…
A Framework for Combining Defeasible Argumentation with Labeled Deduction
Carlos Iván Chesñevar, Guillermo Ricardo Simari
In the last years, there has been an increasing demand of a variety of logical systems, prompted mostly by applications of logic in AI and other related areas. Labeled Deductive Sy…