activity
20242026
collaborators

19 papers

cs.CR2026

Certified in Theory, Broken in Practice: Assumption Gaps in Cryptographic Model Certification

Carter Luck, Olive Franzese-McLaughlin, Elisaweta Masserova +3

Privacy-preserving machine learning auditing protocols allow auditors to assess models for properties such as accuracy or fairness, without revealing their internals or training da…

cs.LG2026

Private Rate-Constrained Optimization with Applications to Fair Learning

Mohammad Yaghini, Tudor Cebere, Michael Menart +2

Many problems in trustworthy ML can be expressed as constraints on prediction rates across subpopulations, including group fairness constraints (demographic parity, equalized odds,…

cs.LG2026

Efficient Public Verification of Private ML via Regularization

Zoë Ruha Bell, Anvith Thudi, Olive Franzese-McLaughlin +2

Training with differential privacy (DP) guarantees dataset members that they cannot be identified by users of the released model. However, those data providers, and, in general, th…

cs.AI2026

CaMeLs Can Use Computers Too: System-level Security for Computer Use Agents

Hanna Foerster, Tom Blanchard, Kristina Nikolić +6

AI agents are vulnerable to prompt injection attacks, where malicious content hijacks agent behavior. Among proposed defenses, architectural isolation provides the strongest guaran…

cs.LG2026

Beyond Laplace and Gaussian: Exploring the Generalized Gaussian Mechanism for Private Machine Learning

Roy Rinberg, Ilia Shumailov, Vikrant Singhal +2

Differential privacy (DP) is obtained by randomizing a data analysis algorithm, which necessarily introduces a tradeoff between its utility and privacy. Many DP mechanisms are buil…

cs.LG2026

Gauss-Newton Unlearning for the LLM Era

Lev McKinney, Anvith Thudi, Juhan Bae +4

Standard large language model training can create models that produce outputs their trainer deems unacceptable in deployment. The probability of these outputs can be reduced using…