most citedTowards A Rigorous Science of Interpretable Machine Learning

3.2k citations · 4.2k across the 5 of their papers we have counts for

collaborators

5 papers

cs.LG201997 cited

Towards Realistic Individual Recourse and Actionable Explanations in Black-Box Decision Making Systems

Shalmali Joshi, Oluwasanmi Koyejo, Warut Vijitbenjaronk +2

Machine learning based decision making systems are increasingly affecting humans. An individual can suffer an undesirable outcome under such decision making systems (e.g. denied cr…

stat.ML2017165 cited

The (Un)reliability of saliency methods

Pieter-Jan Kindermans, Sara Hooker, Julius Adebayo +5

Saliency methods aim to explain the predictions of deep neural networks. These methods lack reliability when the explanation is sensitive to factors that do not contribute to the m…

stat.ML20171 cited

Proceedings of the 2017 ICML Workshop on Human Interpretability in Machine Learning (WHI 2017)

Been Kim, Dmitry M. Malioutov, Kush R. Varshney +1

This is the Proceedings of the 2017 ICML Workshop on Human Interpretability in Machine Learning (WHI 2017), which was held in Sydney, Australia, August 10, 2017. Invited speakers w…

cs.LG2017751 cited

SmoothGrad: removing noise by adding noise

Daniel Smilkov, Nikhil Thorat, Been Kim +2

Explaining the output of a deep network remains a challenge. In the case of an image classifier, one type of explanation is to identify pixels that strongly influence the final dec…

stat.ML20173.2k cited

Towards A Rigorous Science of Interpretable Machine Learning

Finale Doshi-Velez, Been Kim

As machine learning systems become ubiquitous, there has been a surge of interest in interpretable machine learning: systems that provide explanation for their outputs. These expla…