7 papers
From Perceived Effectiveness to Measured Impact: Identity-Aware Evaluation of Automated Counter-Stereotypes
Svetlana Kiritchenko, Anna Kerkhof, Isar Nejadgholi +1
We investigate the effect of automatically generated counter-stereotypes on gender bias held by users of various demographics on social media. Building on recent NLP advancements a…
Fine-Tuning Lowers Safety and Disrupts Evaluation Consistency
Kathleen C. Fraser, Hillary Dawkins, Isar Nejadgholi +1
Fine-tuning a general-purpose large language model (LLM) for a specific domain or task has become a routine procedure for ordinary users. However, fine-tuning is known to remove th…
When Detection Fails: The Power of Fine-Tuned Models to Generate Human-Like Social Media Text
Hillary Dawkins, Kathleen C. Fraser, Svetlana Kiritchenko
Detecting AI-generated text is a difficult problem to begin with; detecting AI-generated text on social media is made even more difficult due to the short text length and informal,…
Uncovering Bias in Large Vision-Language Models at Scale with Counterfactuals
Phillip Howard, Kathleen C. Fraser, Anahita Bhiwandiwalla +1
With the advent of Large Language Models (LLMs) possessing increasingly impressive capabilities, a number of Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) have been proposed to augment LLMs…
Tackling Social Bias against the Poor: A Dataset and Taxonomy on Aporophobia
Georgina Curto, Svetlana Kiritchenko, Muhammad Hammad Fahim Siddiqui +2
Eradicating poverty is the first goal in the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals. However, aporophobia -- the societal bias against people living in poverty -- constitutes…
Detecting AI-Generated Text: Factors Influencing Detectability with Current Methods
Kathleen C. Fraser, Hillary Dawkins, Svetlana Kiritchenko
Large language models (LLMs) have advanced to a point that even humans have difficulty discerning whether a text was generated by another human, or by a computer. However, knowing…