collaborators

15 papers

cs.LG2026

Rubric Dropout: A Simple Way to Mitigate Reward Hacking in Rubric-as-Reward RL

Minglai Yang, Xinyu Guo, Utkarsh Tyagi +6

Reinforcement learning against rubrics, lists of criteria graded by an LLM judge, has become a standard way to post-train language models on tasks with no deterministic answer. The…

cs.AI2026

Model or Harness? An Interaction-Centric Taxonomy for Localizing Agent Failures

Harsh Raj, Vipul Gupta, Anas Mahmoud +4

Existing evaluations often reduce agent failures to system-level outcomes, obscuring where the fault originated and which intervention would improve the agent system. This creates…

cs.AI2026

CRAFT: Clustering Rubrics to Diagnose Weak LLM Capabilities and Generate Targeted Fine-Tuning Data

Vipul Gupta, Zihao Wang, Razvan-Gabriel Dumitru +3

Evaluations should do more than measure a models current performance. They should tell us what to fix for the next model iteration and provide a way to generate targeted post train…

cs.LG2026

SWE-INTERACT: Reimagining SWE Benchmarks as User-Driven Long-Horizon Coding Sessions

Mohit Raghavendra, Anisha Gunjal, Aakash Sabharwal +1

We introduce SWE-Interact, a new testbed for evaluating coding agents on multi-turn, interactive, user-driven software engineering tasks. Existing frontier SWE benchmarks typically…

cs.LG2026

Rubric-Guided Self-Distillation: Post-Training Without Rubric Verifiers

MohammadHossein Rezaei, Anas Mahmoud, Zihao Wang +6

Rubrics have emerged as an alternative to RLVR in open-ended domains where a single ground-truth final answer is not available. Existing rubric-based training methods rely on an LL…

cs.AI2026

Not Every Rubric Teaches Equally: Policy-Aware Rubric Rewards for RLVR

Utkarsh Tyagi, Xingang Guo, MohammadHossein Rezaei +5

Reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards has made post-training highly effective when correctness can be checked automatically. However, many important model behaviors requir…