activity
20152026
most citedSafe Exploration in Continuous Action Spaces

275 citations · 437 across the 32 of their papers we have counts for

collaborators

34 papers

cs.LG2026

Reinforcement Learning with Segment Reward Feedback under Linear Function Approximation

Fengxu Liu, Siwei Wang, Gal Dalal +2

Classical reinforcement learning (RL) assumes that a reward is observed for every visited state-action pair. However, in real-world applications such as autonomous driving, such fi…

cs.CV2026

Look Where You Say You're Looking: Self-Grounded Attention for Visual Reasoning

Uri Berger, Gal Chechik, Gal Dalal

We introduce Self-Saliency, a method for training Vision-Language Models (VLMs) to increase the alignment between their visual attention and the image regions mentioned in their re…

cs.LG2026

More Test-Time Compute Can Hurt: Overestimation Bias in LLM Beam Search

Gal Dalal, Assaf Hallak, Gal Chechik +1

Wider beam search should improve LLM reasoning, but when should you stop widening? Prior work on beam width selection has focused on inference efficiency \citep{qin2025dsbd, freita…

cs.AI2025

Reliable Policy Iteration: Performance Robustness Across Architecture and Environment Perturbations

S. R. Eshwar, Aniruddha Mukherjee, Kintan Saha +4

In a recent work, we proposed Reliable Policy Iteration (RPI), that restores policy iteration's monotonicity-of-value-estimates property to the function approximation setting. Here…

cs.LG2025

Monotone and Conservative Policy Iteration Beyond the Tabular Case

S. R. Eshwar, Gugan Thoppe, Ananyabrata Barua +2

We introduce Reliable Policy Iteration (RPI) and Conservative RPI (CRPI), variants of Policy Iteration (PI) and Conservative PI (CPI), that retain tabular guarantees under function…

cs.LG2025

Reinforcement Learning with Segment Feedback

Yihan Du, Anna Winnicki, Gal Dalal +2

Standard reinforcement learning (RL) assumes that an agent can observe a reward for each state-action pair. However, in practical applications, it is often difficult and costly to…

cs.LG2024★ 1 cited

Gradient Boosting Reinforcement Learning

Benjamin Fuhrer, Chen Tessler, Gal Dalal

We present Gradient Boosting Reinforcement Learning (GBRL), a framework that adapts the strengths of gradient boosting trees (GBT) to reinforcement learning (RL) tasks. While neura…

cs.AI2024

PlaMo: Plan and Move in Rich 3D Physical Environments

Assaf Hallak, Gal Dalal, Chen Tessler +3

Controlling humanoids in complex physically simulated worlds is a long-standing challenge with numerous applications in gaming, simulation, and visual content creation. In our setu…

cs.AI2024★ 1 cited

Tree Search-Based Policy Optimization under Stochastic Execution Delay

David Valensi, Esther Derman, Shie Mannor +1

The standard formulation of Markov decision processes (MDPs) assumes that the agent's decisions are executed immediately. However, in numerous realistic applications such as roboti…

cs.LG2024★ 1 cited

Exploration-Driven Policy Optimization in RLHF: Theoretical Insights on Efficient Data Utilization

Yihan Du, Anna Winnicki, Gal Dalal +2

Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF) has achieved impressive empirical successes while relying on a small amount of human feedback. However, there is limited theoretic…

math.PR2023★ 1 cited

On the Products of Stochastic and Diagonal Matrices

Assaf Hallak, Gal Dalal

Consider a stochastic matrix and diagonal matrix In this work, we introduce Tilted matrices. A Tilted matrix is the product , where is a diagonal normalization…

cs.LG2023

Policy Gradient with Tree Expansion

Gal Dalal, Assaf Hallak, Gugan Thoppe +2

Policy gradient methods are notorious for having a large variance and high sample complexity. To mitigate this, we introduce SoftTreeMax -- a generalization of softmax that employs…

cs.LG2022

SoftTreeMax: Policy Gradient with Tree Search

Gal Dalal, Assaf Hallak, Shie Mannor +1

Policy-gradient methods are widely used for learning control policies. They can be easily distributed to multiple workers and reach state-of-the-art results in many domains. Unfort…

cs.NI2022★ 7 cited

Implementing Reinforcement Learning Datacenter Congestion Control in NVIDIA NICs

Benjamin Fuhrer, Yuval Shpigelman, Chen Tessler +4

As communication protocols evolve, datacenter network utilization increases. As a result, congestion is more frequent, causing higher latency and packet loss. Combined with the inc…

cs.LG2022

Reinforcement Learning with a Terminator

Guy Tennenholtz, Nadav Merlis, Lior Shani +5

We present the problem of reinforcement learning with exogenous termination. We define the Termination Markov Decision Process (TerMDP), an extension of the MDP framework, in which…

cs.LG2022

Planning and Learning with Adaptive Lookahead

Aviv Rosenberg, Assaf Hallak, Shie Mannor +2

Some of the most powerful reinforcement learning frameworks use planning for action selection. Interestingly, their planning horizon is either fixed or determined arbitrarily by th…

cs.LG2021★ 3 cited

On Covariate Shift of Latent Confounders in Imitation and Reinforcement Learning

Guy Tennenholtz, Assaf Hallak, Gal Dalal +3

We consider the problem of using expert data with unobserved confounders for imitation and reinforcement learning. We begin by defining the problem of learning from confounded expe…

cs.AI2021★ 1 cited

Improve Agents without Retraining: Parallel Tree Search with Off-Policy Correction

Assaf Hallak, Gal Dalal, Steven Dalton +3

Tree Search (TS) is crucial to some of the most influential successes in reinforcement learning. Here, we tackle two major challenges with TS that limit its usability: \textit{dist…

cs.LG2021

Reinforcement Learning for Datacenter Congestion Control

Chen Tessler, Yuval Shpigelman, Gal Dalal +5

We approach the task of network congestion control in datacenters using Reinforcement Learning (RL). Successful congestion control algorithms can dramatically improve latency and o…

cs.LG2021★ 4 cited

Acting in Delayed Environments with Non-Stationary Markov Policies

Esther Derman, Gal Dalal, Shie Mannor

The standard Markov Decision Process (MDP) formulation hinges on the assumption that an action is executed immediately after it was chosen. However, assuming it is often unrealisti…

cs.LG2020★ 3 cited

The Architectural Implications of Distributed Reinforcement Learning on CPU-GPU Systems

Ahmet Inci, Evgeny Bolotin, Yaosheng Fu +4

With deep reinforcement learning (RL) methods achieving results that exceed human capabilities in games, robotics, and simulated environments, continued scaling of RL training is c…

cs.LG2019★ 6 cited

A Tale of Two-Timescale Reinforcement Learning with the Tightest Finite-Time Bound

Gal Dalal, Balazs Szorenyi, Gugan Thoppe

Policy evaluation in reinforcement learning is often conducted using two-timescale stochastic approximation, which results in various gradient temporal difference methods such as G…

cs.LG2018

How to Combine Tree-Search Methods in Reinforcement Learning

Yonathan Efroni, Gal Dalal, Bruno Scherrer +1

Finite-horizon lookahead policies are abundantly used in Reinforcement Learning and demonstrate impressive empirical success. Usually, the lookahead policies are implemented with s…

cs.LG2018★ 8 cited

Multiple-Step Greedy Policies in Online and Approximate Reinforcement Learning

Yonathan Efroni, Gal Dalal, Bruno Scherrer +1

Multiple-step lookahead policies have demonstrated high empirical competence in Reinforcement Learning, via the use of Monte Carlo Tree Search or Model Predictive Control. In a rec…