activity
20162023
most citedOn the Utility of Learning about Humans for Human-AI Coordination

91 citations · 189 across the 19 of their papers we have counts for

collaborators
Showing cs.LGShow all

13 papers · 1 filter

cs.LG2023★ 2 cited

Explaining grokking through circuit efficiency

Vikrant Varma, Rohin Shah, Zachary Kenton +2

One of the most surprising puzzles in neural network generalisation is grokking: a network with perfect training accuracy but poor generalisation will, upon further training, trans…

cs.LG2023★ 6 cited

Does Circuit Analysis Interpretability Scale? Evidence from Multiple Choice Capabilities in Chinchilla

Tom Lieberum, Matthew Rahtz, János Kramár +4

\emph{Circuit analysis} is a promising technique for understanding the internal mechanisms of language models. However, existing analyses are done in small models far from the stat…

cs.LG2022★ 16 cited

Goal Misgeneralization: Why Correct Specifications Aren't Enough For Correct Goals

Rohin Shah, Vikrant Varma, Ramana Kumar +4

The field of AI alignment is concerned with AI systems that pursue unintended goals. One commonly studied mechanism by which an unintended goal might arise is specification gaming,…

cs.LG2022★ 7 cited

An Empirical Investigation of Representation Learning for Imitation

Xin Chen, Sam Toyer, Cody Wild +9

Imitation learning often needs a large demonstration set in order to handle the full range of situations that an agent might find itself in during deployment. However, collecting e…

cs.LG2021★ 4 cited

The MineRL BASALT Competition on Learning from Human Feedback

Rohin Shah, Cody Wild, Steven H. Wang +10

The last decade has seen a significant increase of interest in deep learning research, with many public successes that have demonstrated its potential. As such, these systems are n…

cs.LG2021

Learning What To Do by Simulating the Past

David Lindner, Rohin Shah, Pieter Abbeel +1

Since reward functions are hard to specify, recent work has focused on learning policies from human feedback. However, such approaches are impeded by the expense of acquiring such…

cs.LG2021

Combining Reward Information from Multiple Sources

Dmitrii Krasheninnikov, Rohin Shah, Herke van Hoof

Given two sources of evidence about a latent variable, one can combine the information from both by multiplying the likelihoods of each piece of evidence. However, when one or both…

cs.LG2021★ 8 cited

Evaluating the Robustness of Collaborative Agents

Paul Knott, Micah Carroll, Sam Devlin +4

In order for agents trained by deep reinforcement learning to work alongside humans in realistic settings, we will need to ensure that the agents are \emph{robust}. Since the real…

cs.LG2020★ 7 cited

The MAGICAL Benchmark for Robust Imitation

Sam Toyer, Rohin Shah, Andrew Critch +1

Imitation Learning (IL) algorithms are typically evaluated in the same environment that was used to create demonstrations. This rewards precise reproduction of demonstrations in on…

cs.LG2019★ 91 cited

On the Utility of Learning about Humans for Human-AI Coordination

Micah Carroll, Rohin Shah, Mark K. Ho +4

While we would like agents that can coordinate with humans, current algorithms such as self-play and population-based training create agents that can coordinate with themselves. Ag…

cs.LG2019★ 14 cited

On the Feasibility of Learning, Rather than Assuming, Human Biases for Reward Inference

Rohin Shah, Noah Gundotra, Pieter Abbeel +1

Our goal is for agents to optimize the right reward function, despite how difficult it is for us to specify what that is. Inverse Reinforcement Learning (IRL) enables us to infer r…

cs.LG2019★ 15 cited

Preferences Implicit in the State of the World

Rohin Shah, Dmitrii Krasheninnikov, Jordan Alexander +2

Reinforcement learning (RL) agents optimize only the features specified in a reward function and are indifferent to anything left out inadvertently. This means that we must not onl…

cs.LG2018★ 5 cited

Active Inverse Reward Design

Sören Mindermann, Rohin Shah, Adam Gleave +1

Designers of AI agents often iterate on the reward function in a trial-and-error process until they get the desired behavior, but this only guarantees good behavior in the training…