3 citations · 5 across the 4 of their papers we have counts for
5 papers · 1 filter
The Inverse Problem for Argumentation Gradual Semantics
Nir Oren, Bruno Yun, Srdjan Vesic +1
Gradual semantics with abstract argumentation provide each argument with a score reflecting its acceptability, i.e. how "much" it is attacked by other arguments. Many different gra…
Dung's semantics satisfy attack removal monotonicity
Leila Amgoud, Srdjan Vesic
We show that preferred, stable, complete, and grounded semantics satisfy attack removal monotonicity. This means that if an attack from b to a is removed, the status of a cannot wo…
Representing Pure Nash Equilibria in Argumentation
Bruno Yun, Srdjan Vesic, Nir Oren
In this paper we describe an argumentation-based representation of normal form games, and demonstrate how argumentation can be used to compute pure strategy Nash equilibria. Our ap…
A note on the uniqueness of models in social abstract argumentation
Leila Amgoud, Elise Bonzon, Marco Correia +7
Social abstract argumentation is a principled way to assign values to conflicting (weighted) arguments. In this note we discuss the important property of the uniqueness of the mode…
Agenda Separability in Judgment Aggregation
Jérôme Lang, Marija Slavkovik, Srdjan Vesic
One of the better studied properties for operators in judgment aggregation is independence, which essentially dictates that the collective judgment on one issue should not depend o…