activity
20142026
most citedIdentifying the Class of Maxi-Consistent Operators in Argumentation

14 citations · 29 across the 11 of their papers we have counts for

collaborators
Showing cs.AIShow all

10 papers · 1 filter

cs.AI2026

On the Existence of an Inverse Solution for Preference-Based Reductions in Argumentation

Alessio Zaninotto, Bruno Yun, Nir Oren +1

Preference-based argumentation frameworks (PAFs) extend Dung's approach to abstract argumentation (AAFs) by encoding preferences over arguments. Such preferences control the transf…

cs.AI2026

Rejecting Arguments Based on Doubt in Structured Bipolar Argumentation

Michael A. Müller, Srdjan Vesic, Bruno Yun

This paper develops a new approach to computational argumentation that is informed by philosophical and linguistic views. Namely, it takes into account two ideas that have received…

cs.AI2024

Impact Measures for Gradual Argumentation Semantics

Caren Al Anaissy, Jérôme Delobelle, Srdjan Vesic +1

Argumentation is a formalism allowing to reason with contradictory information by modeling arguments and their interactions. There are now an increasing number of gradual semantics…

cs.AI2022★ 1 cited

The Inverse Problem for Argumentation Gradual Semantics

Nir Oren, Bruno Yun, Srdjan Vesic +1

Gradual semantics with abstract argumentation provide each argument with a score reflecting its acceptability, i.e. how "much" it is attacked by other arguments. Many different gra…

cs.AI2020★ 1 cited

Dung's semantics satisfy attack removal monotonicity

Leila Amgoud, Srdjan Vesic

We show that preferred, stable, complete, and grounded semantics satisfy attack removal monotonicity. This means that if an attack from b to a is removed, the status of a cannot wo…

cs.AI2020

Representing Pure Nash Equilibria in Argumentation

Bruno Yun, Srdjan Vesic, Nir Oren

In this paper we describe an argumentation-based representation of normal form games, and demonstrate how argumentation can be used to compute pure strategy Nash equilibria. Our ap…

cs.AI2017★ 3 cited

A note on the uniqueness of models in social abstract argumentation

Leila Amgoud, Elise Bonzon, Marco Correia +7

Social abstract argumentation is a principled way to assign values to conflicting (weighted) arguments. In this note we discuss the important property of the uniqueness of the mode…

cs.AI2016★ 3 cited

Agenda Separability in Judgment Aggregation

Jérôme Lang, Marija Slavkovik, Srdjan Vesic

One of the better studied properties for operators in judgment aggregation is independence, which essentially dictates that the collective judgment on one issue should not depend o…

cs.AI2015★ 7 cited

A partial taxonomy of judgment aggregation rules, and their properties

Jerôme Lang, Gabriella Pigozzi, Marija Slavkovik +2

The literature on judgment aggregation is moving from studying impossibility results regarding aggregation rules towards studying specific judgment aggregation rules. Here we give…

cs.AI2014★ 14 cited

Identifying the Class of Maxi-Consistent Operators in Argumentation

Srdjan Vesic

Dung's abstract argumentation theory can be seen as a general framework for non-monotonic reasoning. An important question is then: what is the class of logics that can be subsumed…