activity
20162022
most citedOn the (In)fidelity and Sensitivity for Explanations

63 citations · 90 across the 9 of their papers we have counts for

collaborators
Showing cs.LGShow all

6 papers · 1 filter

cs.LG2022★ 2 cited

Towards Explaining Distribution Shifts

Sean Kulinski, David I. Inouye

A distribution shift can have fundamental consequences such as signaling a change in the operating environment or significantly reducing the accuracy of downstream models. Thus, un…

cs.LG2021★ 6 cited

Feature Shift Detection: Localizing Which Features Have Shifted via Conditional Distribution Tests

Sean Kulinski, Saurabh Bagchi, David I. Inouye

While previous distribution shift detection approaches can identify if a shift has occurred, these approaches cannot localize which specific features have caused a distribution shi…

cs.LG2021★ 2 cited

Shapley Explanation Networks

Rui Wang, Xiaoqian Wang, David I. Inouye

Shapley values have become one of the most popular feature attribution explanation methods. However, most prior work has focused on post-hoc Shapley explanations, which can be comp…

cs.LG2020★ 1 cited

Exploring Adversarial Examples via Invertible Neural Networks

Ruqi Bai, Saurabh Bagchi, David I. Inouye

Adversarial examples (AEs) are images that can mislead deep neural network (DNN) classifiers via introducing slight perturbations into original images. This security vulnerability…

cs.LG2019

Automated Dependence Plots

David I. Inouye, Liu Leqi, Joon Sik Kim +2

In practical applications of machine learning, it is necessary to look beyond standard metrics such as test accuracy in order to validate various qualitative properties of a model.…

cs.LG2019★ 63 cited

On the (In)fidelity and Sensitivity for Explanations

Chih-Kuan Yeh, Cheng-Yu Hsieh, Arun Sai Suggala +2

We consider objective evaluation measures of saliency explanations for complex black-box machine learning models. We propose simple robust variants of two notions that have been co…