activity
20162024
most citedEvaluating the State-of-the-Art of End-to-End Natural Language Generation: The E2E NLG Challenge

185 citations · 582 across the 36 of their papers we have counts for

collaborators
Showing 2023Show all

10 papers · 1 filter

cs.LG2023

Multitask Multimodal Prompted Training for Interactive Embodied Task Completion

Georgios Pantazopoulos, Malvina Nikandrou, Amit Parekh +6

Interactive and embodied tasks pose at least two fundamental challenges to existing Vision & Language (VL) models, including 1) grounding language in trajectories of actions and ob…

cs.RO2023

FurNav: Development and Preliminary Study of a Robot Direction Giver

Bruce W. Wilson, Yann Schlosser, Rayane Tarkany +4

When giving directions to a lost-looking tourist, would you first reference the street-names, cardinal directions, landmarks, or simply tell them to walk five hundred metres in one…

cs.CL2023★ 1 cited

Understanding Counterspeech for Online Harm Mitigation

Yi-Ling Chung, Gavin Abercrombie, Florence Enock +2

Counterspeech offers direct rebuttals to hateful speech by challenging perpetrators of hate and showing support to targets of abuse. It provides a promising alternative to more con…

cs.CL2023★ 1 cited

The Dangers of trusting Stochastic Parrots: Faithfulness and Trust in Open-domain Conversational Question Answering

Sabrina Chiesurin, Dimitris Dimakopoulos, Marco Antonio Sobrevilla Cabezudo +4

Large language models are known to produce output which sounds fluent and convincing, but is also often wrong, e.g. "unfaithful" with respect to a rationale as retrieved from a kno…

cs.CL2023★ 2 cited

iLab at SemEval-2023 Task 11 Le-Wi-Di: Modelling Disagreement or Modelling Perspectives?

Nikolas Vitsakis, Amit Parekh, Tanvi Dinkar +3

There are two competing approaches for modelling annotator disagreement: distributional soft-labelling approaches (which aim to capture the level of disagreement) or modelling pers…

cs.CL2023

ANTONIO: Towards a Systematic Method of Generating NLP Benchmarks for Verification

Marco Casadio, Luca Arnaboldi, Matthew L. Daggitt +5

Verification of machine learning models used in Natural Language Processing (NLP) is known to be a hard problem. In particular, many known neural network verification methods that…

cs.CL2023★ 4 cited

Missing Information, Unresponsive Authors, Experimental Flaws: The Impossibility of Assessing the Reproducibility of Previous Human Evaluations in NLP

Anya Belz, Craig Thomson, Ehud Reiter +39

We report our efforts in identifying a set of previous human evaluations in NLP that would be suitable for a coordinated study examining what makes human evaluations in NLP more/le…

cs.CV2023

Quality-agnostic Image Captioning to Safely Assist People with Vision Impairment

Lu Yu, Malvina Nikandrou, Jiali Jin +1

Automated image captioning has the potential to be a useful tool for people with vision impairments. Images taken by this user group are often noisy, which leads to incorrect and e…

cs.CL2023★ 1 cited

SemEval-2023 Task 11: Learning With Disagreements (LeWiDi)

Elisa Leonardelli, Alexandra Uma, Gavin Abercrombie +6

NLP datasets annotated with human judgments are rife with disagreements between the judges. This is especially true for tasks depending on subjective judgments such as sentiment an…

cs.CL2023★ 7 cited

Consistency is Key: Disentangling Label Variation in Natural Language Processing with Intra-Annotator Agreement

Gavin Abercrombie, Tanvi Dinkar, Amanda Cercas Curry +2

We commonly use agreement measures to assess the utility of judgements made by human annotators in Natural Language Processing (NLP) tasks. While inter-annotator agreement is frequ…