2 citations · 2 across the 4 of their papers we have counts for
6 papers
Strategic Argumentation Dialogues for Persuasion: Framework and Experiments Based on Modelling the Beliefs and Concerns of the Persuadee
Emmanuel Hadoux, Anthony Hunter, Sylwia Polberg
Persuasion is an important and yet complex aspect of human intelligence. When undertaken through dialogue, the deployment of good arguments, and therefore counterarguments, clearly…
Polynomial-time Updates of Epistemic States in a Fragment of Probabilistic Epistemic Argumentation (Technical Report)
Nico Potyka, Sylwia Polberg, Anthony Hunter
Probabilistic epistemic argumentation allows for reasoning about argumentation problems in a way that is well founded by probability theory. Epistemic states are represented by pro…
Domain Modelling in Computational Persuasion for Behaviour Change in Healthcare
Lisa Chalaguine, Emmanuel Hadoux, Fiona Hamilton +4
The aim of behaviour change is to help people to change aspects of their behaviour for the better (e.g., to decrease calorie intake, to drink in moderation, to take more exercise,…
Epistemic Graphs for Representing and Reasoning with Positive and Negative Influences of Arguments
Anthony Hunter, Sylwia Polberg, Matthias Thimm
This paper introduces epistemic graphs as a generalization of the epistemic approach to probabilistic argumentation. In these graphs, an argument can be believed or disbelieved up…
Empirical Evaluation of Abstract Argumentation: Supporting the Need for Bipolar and Probabilistic Approaches
Sylwia Polberg, Anthony Hunter
In dialogical argumentation it is often assumed that the involved parties always correctly identify the intended statements posited by each other, realize all of the associated rel…
Understanding the Abstract Dialectical Framework (Preliminary Report)
Sylwia Polberg
Among the most general structures extending the framework by Dung are the abstract dialectical frameworks (ADFs). They come equipped with various types of semantics, with the most…