3 papers
cs.DL2025
ML Researchers Support Openness in Peer Review But Are Concerned About Resubmission Bias
Vishisht Rao, Justin Payan, Andrew McCallum +1
Peer-review venues have increasingly adopted open reviewing policies that publicly release anonymized reviews and permit public commenting. Venues have adopted a variety of policie…
cs.CL2025
FLAWS: A Benchmark for Error Identification and Localization in Scientific Papers
Sarina Xi, Vishisht Rao, Justin Payan +1
The identification and localization of errors is a core task in peer review, yet the exponential growth of scientific output has made it increasingly difficult for human reviewers…
cs.DL2025
Detecting LLM-Generated Peer Reviews
Vishisht Rao, Aounon Kumar, Himabindu Lakkaraju +1
The integrity of peer review is fundamental to scientific progress, but the rise of large language models (LLMs) has introduced concerns that some reviewers may rely on these tools…