activity
20032017
most citedCombining Independent Modules to Solve Multiple-choice Synonym and Analogy Problems

136 citations · 171 across the 6 of their papers we have counts for

collaborators

6 papers

cs.AI2017★ 15 cited

Deep Reinforcement Learning for Dexterous Manipulation with Concept Networks

Aditya Gudimella, Ross Story, Matineh Shaker +4

Deep reinforcement learning yields great results for a large array of problems, but models are generally retrained anew for each new problem to be solved. Prior learning and knowle…

cs.GT2016★ 8 cited

Peer Prediction with Heterogeneous Tasks

Debmalya Mandal, Matthew Leifer, David C. Parkes +2

Peer prediction is a method to promote contributions of information by users in settings in which there is no way to verify the quality of responses. In multi-task peer prediction,…

cs.GT2016★ 11 cited

Informed Truthfulness in Multi-Task Peer Prediction

Victor Shnayder, Arpit Agarwal, Rafael Frongillo +1

The problem of peer prediction is to elicit information from agents in settings without any objective ground truth against which to score reports. Peer prediction mechanisms seek t…

cs.GT2014★ 1 cited

Truthful Prioritization Schemes for Spectrum Sharing

Victor Shnayder, David C. Parkes, Vikas Kawadia +1

We design a protocol for dynamic prioritization of data on shared routers such as untethered 3G/4G devices. The mechanism prioritizes bandwidth in favor of users with the highest v…

cs.LG2005

Combining Independent Modules in Lexical Multiple-Choice Problems

Peter D. Turney, Michael L. Littman, Jeffrey Bigham +1

Existing statistical approaches to natural language problems are very coarse approximations to the true complexity of language processing. As such, no single technique will be best…

cs.CL2003★ 136 cited

Combining Independent Modules to Solve Multiple-choice Synonym and Analogy Problems

Peter D. Turney, Michael L. Littman, Jeffrey Bigham +1

Existing statistical approaches to natural language problems are very coarse approximations to the true complexity of language processing. As such, no single technique will be best…