activity
20132022
most citedDeep-learning Top Taggers or The End of QCD?

276 citations · 1.6k across the 18 of their papers we have counts for

collaborators

19 papers

hep-ph2022★ 113 cited

Machine Learning and LHC Event Generation

Anja Butter, Tilman Plehn, Steffen Schumann +48

First-principle simulations are at the heart of the high-energy physics research program. They link the vast data output of multi-purpose detectors with fundamental theory predicti…

hep-ph2022★ 21 cited

Ephemeral Learning -- Augmenting Triggers with Online-Trained Normalizing Flows

Anja Butter, Sascha Diefenbacher, Gregor Kasieczka +4

The large data rates at the LHC require an online trigger system to select relevant collisions. Rather than compressing individual events, we propose to compress an entire data set…

hep-ph2021★ 47 cited

Symmetries, Safety, and Self-Supervision

Barry M. Dillon, Gregor Kasieczka, Hans Olischlager +3

Collider searches face the challenge of defining a representation of high-dimensional data such that physical symmetries are manifest, the discriminating features are retained, and…

hep-ph2021★ 41 cited

Unsupervised Hadronic SUEP at the LHC

Jared Barron, David Curtin, Gregor Kasieczka +2

Confining dark sectors with pseudo-conformal dynamics produce SUEP, or Soft Unclustered Energy Patterns, at colliders: isotropic dark hadrons with soft and democratic energies. We…

hep-ph2020★ 8 cited

How to GAN Higher Jet Resolution

Pierre Baldi, Lukas Blecher, Anja Butter +6

QCD-jets at the LHC are described by simple physics principles. We show how super-resolution generative networks can learn the underlying structures and use them to improve the res…

hep-ph2020★ 69 cited

GANplifying Event Samples

Anja Butter, Sascha Diefenbacher, Gregor Kasieczka +2

A critical question concerning generative networks applied to event generation in particle physics is if the generated events add statistical precision beyond the training sample.…

hep-ph2020★ 34 cited

Towards Machine Learning Analytics for Jet Substructure

Gregor Kasieczka, Simone Marzani, Gregory Soyez +1

The past few years have seen a rapid development of machine-learning algorithms. While surely augmenting performance, these complex tools are often treated as black-boxes and may i…

hep-ph2020★ 97 cited

Invertible Networks or Partons to Detector and Back Again

Marco Bellagente, Anja Butter, Gregor Kasieczka +5

For simulations where the forward and the inverse directions have a physics meaning, invertible neural networks are especially useful. A conditional INN can invert a detector simul…

hep-ph2020★ 44 cited

Per-Object Systematics using Deep-Learned Calibration

Gregor Kasieczka, Michel Luchmann, Florian Otterpohl +1

We show how to treat systematic uncertainties using Bayesian deep networks for regression. First, we analyze how these networks separately trace statistical and systematic uncertai…

hep-ph2019★ 89 cited

How to GAN away Detector Effects

Marco Bellagente, Anja Butter, Gregor Kasieczka +2

LHC analyses directly comparing data and simulated events bear the danger of using first-principle predictions only as a black-box part of event simulation. We show how simulations…

hep-ph2019★ 21 cited

CapsNets Continuing the Convolutional Quest

Sascha Diefenbacher, Hermann Frost, Gregor Kasieczka +2

Capsule networks are ideal tools to combine event-level and subjet information at the LHC. After benchmarking our capsule network against standard convolutional networks, we show h…

hep-ph2019★ 56 cited

Deep-Learning Jets with Uncertainties and More

Sven Bollweg, Manuel Haussmann, Gregor Kasieczka +3

Bayesian neural networks allow us to keep track of uncertainties, for example in top tagging, by learning a tagger output together with an error band. We illustrate the main featur…

hep-ph2019★ 240 cited

The Machine Learning Landscape of Top Taggers

G. Kasieczka, T. Plehn, A. Butter +24

Based on the established task of identifying boosted, hadronically decaying top quarks, we compare a wide range of modern machine learning approaches. Unlike most established metho…

hep-ph2018★ 60 cited

Quark-Gluon Tagging: Machine Learning vs Detector

Gregor Kasieczka, Nicholas Kiefer, Tilman Plehn +1

Distinguishing quarks from gluons based on low-level detector output is one of the most challenging applications of multi-variate and machine learning techniques at the LHC. We fir…

hep-ph2018★ 163 cited

QCD or What?

Theo Heimel, Gregor Kasieczka, Tilman Plehn +1

Autoencoder networks, trained only on QCD jets, can be used to search for anomalies in jet-substructure. We show how, based either on images or on 4-vectors, they identify jets fro…

hep-ph2017★ 193 cited

Deep-learned Top Tagging with a Lorentz Layer

Anja Butter, Gregor Kasieczka, Tilman Plehn +1

We introduce a new and highly efficient tagger for hadronically decaying top quarks, based on a deep neural network working with Lorentz vectors and the Minkowski metric. With its…

hep-ph2017★ 276 cited

Deep-learning Top Taggers or The End of QCD?

Gregor Kasieczka, Tilman Plehn, Michael Russell +1

Machine learning based on convolutional neural networks can be used to study jet images from the LHC. Top tagging in fat jets offers a well-defined framework to establish our DeepT…

hep-ph2015

Resonance Searches with an Updated Top Tagger

Gregor Kasieczka, Tilman Plehn, Torben Schell +2

The performance of top taggers, for example in resonance searches, can be significantly enhanced through an increased set of variables, with a special focus on final-state radiatio…

hep-ph2013★ 30 cited

Benchmarking an Even Better HEPTopTagger

Christoph Anders, Catherine Bernaciak, Gregor Kasieczka +2

Top taggers are established analysis tools to reconstruct boosted hadronically decaying top quarks for example in searches for heavy resonances. We first present a dedicated study…