2 citations · 5 across the 6 of their papers we have counts for
10 papers
Relational Argumentation Semantics
Ryuta Arisaka, Takayuki Ito
In this paper, we propose a fresh perspective on argumentation semantics, to view them as a relational database. It offers encapsulation of the underlying argumentation graph, and…
Abstract Interpretation in Formal Argumentation: with a Galois Connection for Abstract Dialectical Frameworks and May-Must Argumentation (First Report)
Ryuta Arisaka, Takayuki Ito
Labelling-based formal argumentation relies on labelling functions that typically assign one of 3 labels to indicate either acceptance, rejection, or else undecided-to-be-either, t…
Numerical Abstract Persuasion Argumentation for Expressing Concurrent Multi-Agent Negotiations
Ryuta Arisaka, Takayuki Ito
A negotiation process by 2 agents e1 and e2 can be interleaved by another negotiation process between, say, e1 and e3. The interleaving may alter the resource allocation assumed at…
Broadening Label-based Argumentation Semantics with May-Must Scales (May-Must Argumentation)
Ryuta Arisaka, Takayuki Ito
The semantics as to which set of arguments in a given argumentation graph may be acceptable (acceptability semantics) can be characterised in a few different ways. Among them, labe…
Formulating Manipulable Argumentation with Intra-/Inter-Agent Preferences
Ryuta Arisaka, Makoto Hagiwara, Takayuki Ito
From marketing to politics, exploitation of incomplete information through selective communication of arguments is ubiquitous. In this work, we focus on development of an argumenta…
Turing-Completeness of Dynamics in Abstract Persuasion Argumentation
Ryuta Arisaka
Abstract Persuasion Argumentation (APA) is a dynamic argumentation formalism that extends Dung argumentation with persuasion relations. In this work, we show through two-counter Mi…