activity
20112026
most citedConfidence sets for persistence diagrams

254 citations · 882 across the 66 of their papers we have counts for

collaborators
Showing stat.MEShow all

13 papers · 1 filter

stat.ME2026

On Nonasymptotic Confidence Intervals for Treatment Effects in Randomized Experiments

Ricardo J. Sandoval, Sivaraman Balakrishnan, Avi Feller +2

We study nonasymptotic (finite-sample) confidence intervals for treatment effects in randomized experiments. In the existing literature, the effective sample sizes of nonasymptotic…

stat.ME2024

Stochastic interventions, sensitivity analysis, and optimal transport

Alexander W. Levis, Edward H. Kennedy, Alec McClean +2

Recent methodological research in causal inference has focused on effects of stochastic interventions, which assign treatment randomly, often according to subject-specific covariat…

stat.ME2024

Doubly-robust inference and optimality in structure-agnostic models with smoothness

Matteo Bonvini, Edward H. Kennedy, Oliver Dukes +1

We study the problem of constructing an estimator of the average treatment effect (ATE) with observational data. The celebrated doubly-robust, augmented-IPW (AIPW) estimator genera…

stat.ME2023

Conservative Inference for Counterfactuals

Sivaraman Balakrishnan, Edward Kennedy, Larry Wasserman

In causal inference, the joint law of a set of counterfactual random variables is generally not identified. We show that a conservative version of the joint law - corresponding to…

stat.ME2023★ 1 cited

Causal Effect Estimation after Propensity Score Trimming with Continuous Treatments

Zach Branson, Edward H. Kennedy, Sivaraman Balakrishnan +1

Propensity score trimming, which discards subjects with propensity scores below a threshold, is a common way to address positivity violations that complicate causal effect estimati…

stat.ME2023★ 1 cited

Robust Universal Inference For Misspecified Models

Beomjo Park, Sivaraman Balakrishnan, Larry Wasserman

In statistical inference, it is rarely realistic that the hypothesized statistical model is well-specified, and consequently it is important to understand the effects of misspecifi…

stat.ME2021

Gaussian Universal Likelihood Ratio Testing

Robin Dunn, Aaditya Ramdas, Sivaraman Balakrishnan +1

The classical likelihood ratio test (LRT) based on the asymptotic chi-squared distribution of the log likelihood is one of the fundamental tools of statistical inference. A recent…

stat.ME2021★ 2 cited

Semiparametric counterfactual density estimation

Edward H. Kennedy, Sivaraman Balakrishnan, Larry Wasserman

Causal effects are often characterized with averages, which can give an incomplete picture of the underlying counterfactual distributions. Here we consider estimating the entire co…

stat.ME2020

Discussion of "On nearly assumption-free tests of nominal confidence interval coverage for causal parameters estimated by machine learning"

Edward H. Kennedy, Sivaraman Balakrishnan, Larry A. Wasserman

We congratulate the authors on their exciting paper, which introduces a novel idea for assessing the estimation bias in causal estimates. Doubly robust estimators are now part of t…

stat.ME2019★ 3 cited

Gaussian Mixture Clustering Using Relative Tests of Fit

Purvasha Chakravarti, Sivaraman Balakrishnan, Larry Wasserman

We consider clustering based on significance tests for Gaussian Mixture Models (GMMs). Our starting point is the SigClust method developed by Liu et al. (2008), which introduces a…

stat.ME2019★ 5 cited

Interactive Martingale Tests for the Global Null

Boyan Duan, Aaditya Ramdas, Sivaraman Balakrishnan +1

Global null testing is a classical problem going back about a century to Fisher's and Stouffer's combination tests. In this work, we present simple martingale analogs of these clas…

stat.ME2018

Sharp instruments for classifying compliers and generalizing causal effects

Edward H. Kennedy, Sivaraman Balakrishnan, Max G'Sell

It is well-known that, without restricting treatment effect heterogeneity, instrumental variable (IV) methods only identify "local" effects among compliers, i.e., those subjects wh…

stat.ME2017

Discussion of "Data-driven confounder selection via Markov and Bayesian networks" by Jenny Häggström

Edward H. Kennedy, Sivaraman Balakrishnan

In this discussion we consider why it is important to estimate causal effect parameters well even they are not identified, propose a partially identified approach for causal infere…