activity
20152026
most citedConstitutional AI: Harmlessness from AI Feedback

334 citations · 1.4k across the 54 of their papers we have counts for

collaborators
Showing cs.CLShow all

9 papers · 1 filter

cs.CL2026

Next-Concept Modeling: Fast, Parallel Coarse-to-Fine Text Generation

Hermann Kumbong, Ishan S. Khare, Iddah Mlauzi +6

Diffusion language models (DLMs) offer parallel sampling for faster generation than autoregressive models, an increasingly important advantage as inference becomes a dominant compu…

cs.CL2026

Distill to Detect: Exposing Stealth Biases in LLMs through Cartridge Distillation

Shayan Talaei, Abhinav Chinta, Devvrit Khatri +3

Language models deployed in high-stakes roles can potentially favor certain entities, brands, or viewpoints, steering user decisions at scale. Such preferential biases can be intro…

cs.CL2026

PolyAlign: Conditional Human-Distribution Alignment

L. D. M. S. Sai Teja, Ufaq Khan, Sathira Silva +2

Post-training methods such as supervised fine-tuning (SFT) and preference optimization typically align language models toward a single global assistant behavior. While effective fo…

cs.CL2025★ 49 cited

Gemini 2.5: Pushing the Frontier with Advanced Reasoning, Multimodality, Long Context, and Next Generation Agentic Capabilities

Gheorghe Comanici, Eric Bieber, Mike Schaekermann +3431

In this report, we introduce the Gemini 2.X model family: Gemini 2.5 Pro and Gemini 2.5 Flash, as well as our earlier Gemini 2.0 Flash and Flash-Lite models. Gemini 2.5 Pro is our…

cs.CL2025

Cartridges: Lightweight and general-purpose long context representations via self-study

Sabri Eyuboglu, Ryan Ehrlich, Simran Arora +8

Large language models are often used to answer queries grounded in large text corpora (e.g. codebases, legal documents, or chat histories) by placing the entire corpus in the conte…

cs.CL2025

Shrinking the Generation-Verification Gap with Weak Verifiers

Jon Saad-Falcon, E. Kelly Buchanan, Mayee F. Chen +9

Verifiers can improve language model capabilities by scoring and ranking responses from generated candidates. Currently, high-quality verifiers are either unscalable (e.g., humans)…

cs.CL2023★ 8 cited

Specific versus General Principles for Constitutional AI

Sandipan Kundu, Yuntao Bai, Saurav Kadavath +33

Human feedback can prevent overtly harmful utterances in conversational models, but may not automatically mitigate subtle problematic behaviors such as a stated desire for self-pre…

cs.CL2023★ 53 cited

The Capacity for Moral Self-Correction in Large Language Models

Deep Ganguli, Amanda Askell, Nicholas Schiefer +46

We test the hypothesis that language models trained with reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF) have the capability to "morally self-correct" -- to avoid producing harmf…

cs.CL2022★ 334 cited

Constitutional AI: Harmlessness from AI Feedback

Yuntao Bai, Saurav Kadavath, Sandipan Kundu +48

As AI systems become more capable, we would like to enlist their help to supervise other AIs. We experiment with methods for training a harmless AI assistant through self-improveme…