activity
20152022
most citedHuman Preferences as Dueling Bandits

8 citations · 11 across the 3 of their papers we have counts for

collaborators

5 papers

cs.IR20228 cited

Human Preferences as Dueling Bandits

Xinyi Yan, Chengxi Luo, Charles L. A. Clarke +3

The dramatic improvements in core information retrieval tasks engendered by neural rankers create a need for novel evaluation methods. If every ranker returns highly relevant items…

cs.IR20213 cited

Predicting Efficiency/Effectiveness Trade-offs for Dense vs. Sparse Retrieval Strategy Selection

Negar Arabzadeh, Xinyi Yan, Charles L. A. Clarke

Over the last few years, contextualized pre-trained transformer models such as BERT have provided substantial improvements on information retrieval tasks. Recent approaches based o…

cs.IR2020

Assessing top- preferences

Charles L. A. Clarke, Alexandra Vtyurina, Mark D. Smucker

Assessors make preference judgments faster and more consistently than graded judgments. Preference judgments can also recognize distinctions between items that appear equivalent un…

cs.IR2016

The Effects of Latency Penalties in Evaluating Push Notification Systems

Luchen Tan, Jimmy Lin, Adam Roegiest +1

We examine the effects of different latency penalties in the evaluation of push notification systems, as operationalized in the TREC 2015 Microblog track evaluation. The purpose of…

cs.IR2015

Assessing Efficiency-Effectiveness Tradeoffs in Multi-Stage Retrieval Systems Without Using Relevance Judgments

Charles L. A. Clarke, J. Shane Culpepper, Alistair Moffat

Large-scale retrieval systems are often implemented as a cascading sequence of phases -- a first filtering step, in which a large set of candidate documents are extracted using a s…